 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, March 3, 2004, 24(9):2102-2111; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3988-03.2004
Previous Article | Next Article
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Dissociating Self-Generated from Passively Applied Head Motion: Neural Mechanisms in the Vestibular Nuclei
Jefferson E. Roy andKathleen E. Cullen Aerospace Medical Research Unit, Department of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1Y6
The ability to distinguish sensory inputs that are a consequence of our own actions from those that result from changes in the external world is essential for perceptual stability and accurate motor control. To accomplish this, it has been proposed that an internal prediction of the consequences of our actions is compared with the actual sensory input to cancel the resultant self-generated activation. Here, we provide evidence for this hypothesis at an early stage of processing in the vestibular system. Previous studies have shown that neurons in the vestibular nucleus, which receive direct inputs from vestibular afferent fibers, are responsive to passively applied head movements. However, these same neurons do not reliably encode head velocity resulting from self-generated movements of the head on the body. In this study, we examined the mechanism that underlies the selective elimination of vestibular sensitivity to active head-on-body rotations. Individual neurons were recorded in monkeys making active head movements. The correspondence between intended and actual head movement was experimentally controlled. We found that a cancellation signal was gated into the vestibular nuclei only in conditions in which the activation of neck proprioceptors matched that expected on the basis of the neck motor command. This finding suggests that vestibular signals that arise from self-generated head movements are inhibited by a mechanism that compares the internal prediction of the sensory consequences by the brain to the actual resultant sensory feedback. Because self-generated vestibular inputs are selectively cancelled early in processing, we propose that this gating is important for the computation of spatial orientation and control of posture by higher-order structures.
Key words: vestibular nucleus; self-motion; reafference; efference copy; gaze shift; vestibular reflexes; head-unrestrained
Received Aug 28, 2003; revised January 5, 2004; accepted January 6, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:
M. K. McCluskey and K. E. Cullen
Eye, Head, and Body Coordination During Large Gaze Shifts in Rhesus Monkeys: Movement Kinematics and the Influence of Posture
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2976 - 2991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
S. G. Sadeghi, L. B. Minor, and K. E. Cullen
Response of Vestibular-Nerve Afferents to Active and Passive Rotations Under Normal Conditions and After Unilateral Labyrinthectomy
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1503 - 1514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. M. Bays and D. M. Wolpert
Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability
J. Physiol., January 15, 2007; 578(2): 387 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
R. B. Towal and M. J. Hartmann
Right-left asymmetries in the whisking behavior of rats anticipate head movements.
J. Neurosci., August 23, 2006; 26(34): 8838 - 8846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
F. Klam and W. Graf
Discrimination between active and passive head movements by macaque ventral and medial intraparietal cortex neurons
J. Physiol., July 15, 2006; 574(2): 367 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. F. A. Poulet and B. Hedwig
The Cellular Basis of a Corollary Discharge
Science, January 27, 2006; 311(5760): 518 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. P. Bassett, M. B. Zugaro, G. M. Muir, E. J. Golob, R. U. Muller, and J. S. Taube
Passive Movements of the Head Do Not Abolish Anticipatory Firing Properties of Head Direction Cells
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1304 - 1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|