 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, June 22, 2005, 25(25):5926-5934; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1360-05.2005
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
The Role of Thalamic Inputs in Surround Receptive Fields of Barrel Neurons
Ernest E. Kwegyir-Afful,1
Randy M. Bruno,2,3
Daniel J. Simons,2 and
Asaf Keller1
1Program in Neuroscience and Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, 2Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, and 3Max Planck Institute, Department of Cellular Physiology, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
Controversy exists regarding the relative roles of thalamic versus intracortical inputs in shaping the response properties of cortical neurons. In the whisker-barrel system, this controversy centers on the mechanisms determining the receptive fields of layer IV (barrel) neurons. Whereas principal whisker-evoked responses are determined by thalamic inputs, the mechanisms responsible for adjacent whisker (AW) responses are in dispute. Here, we took advantage of the fact that lesions of the spinal trigeminal nucleus interpolaris (SpVi) significantly reduce the receptive field size of neurons in the ventroposterior thalamus. We reasoned that if AW responses are established by these thalamic inputs, brainstem lesions would significantly reduce the receptive field sizes of barrel neurons. We obtained extracellular single unit recordings from barrel neurons in response to whisker deflections from control rats and from rats that sustained SpVi lesions. After SpVi lesions, the receptive field of both excitatory and inhibitory barrel neurons decreased significantly in size, whereas offset/onset response ratios increased. Response magnitude decreased only for inhibitory neurons. All of these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that AW responses are determined primarily by direct thalamic inputs and not by intracortical interactions.
Key words: thalamus; trigeminal; vibrissa (whisker); rat; thalamocortical and corticofugal projections; somatosensory cortex
Received April 7, 2005;
revised May 10, 2005;
accepted May 11, 2005.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hirata, J. Aguilar, and M. A. Castro-Alamancos
Influence of Subcortical Inhibition on Barrel Cortex Receptive Fields
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2009;
102(1):
437 - 450.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hirata and M. A. Castro-Alamancos
Cortical Transformation of Wide-Field (Multiwhisker) Sensory Responses
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2008;
100(1):
358 - 370.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. Alloway
Information Processing Streams in Rodent Barrel Cortex: The Differential Functions of Barrel and Septal Circuits
Cereb Cortex,
May 1, 2008;
18(5):
979 - 989.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Egger, T. Nevian, and R. M. Bruno
Subcolumnar Dendritic and Axonal Organization of Spiny Stellate and Star Pyramid Neurons within a Barrel in Rat Somatosensory Cortex
Cereb Cortex,
April 1, 2008;
18(4):
876 - 889.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Furuta, E. Timofeeva, K. Nakamura, K. Okamoto-Furuta, M. Togo, T. Kaneko, and M. Deschenes
Inhibitory Gating of Vibrissal Inputs in the Brainstem
J. Neurosci.,
February 20, 2008;
28(8):
1789 - 1797.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Higley and D. Contreras
Frequency Adaptation Modulates Spatial Integration of Sensory Responses in the Rat Whisker System
J Neurophysiol,
May 1, 2007;
97(5):
3819 - 3824.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Quairiaux, M. Armstrong-James, and E. Welker
Modified Sensory Processing in the Barrel Cortex of the Adult Mouse After Chronic Whisker Stimulation
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2007;
97(3):
2130 - 2147.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Khatri and D. J. Simons
Angularly Nonspecific Response Suppression in Rat Barrel Cortex
Cereb Cortex,
March 1, 2007;
17(3):
599 - 609.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Higley and D. Contreras
Cellular Mechanisms of Suppressive Interactions Between Somatosensory Responses In Vivo
J Neurophysiol,
January 1, 2007;
97(1):
647 - 658.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Katz, J. E. Heiss, and I. Lampl
Cross-Whisker Adaptation of Neurons in the Rat Barrel Cortex
J. Neurosci.,
December 20, 2006;
26(51):
13363 - 13372.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Feldmeyer, J. Lubke, and B. Sakmann
Efficacy and connectivity of intracolumnar pairs of layer 2/3 pyramidal cells in the barrel cortex of juvenile rats
J. Physiol.,
September 1, 2006;
575(2):
583 - 602.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. F. Civillico and D. Contreras
Integration of Evoked Responses in Supragranular Cortex Studied With Optical Recordings In Vivo
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2006;
96(1):
336 - 351.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Shoykhet, P. W. Land, and D. J. Simons
Whisker Trimming Begun at Birth or on Postnatal Day 12 Affects Excitatory and Inhibitory Receptive Fields of Layer IV Barrel Neurons
J Neurophysiol,
December 1, 2005;
94(6):
3987 - 3995.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Timofeeva, C. Dufresne, A. Sik, Z.-W. Zhang, and M. Deschenes
Cholinergic Modulation of Vibrissal Receptive Fields in Trigeminal Nuclei
J. Neurosci.,
October 5, 2005;
25(40):
9135 - 9143.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|