WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, September 28, 2005, 25(39):8948-8953; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1771-05.2005

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thoroughman, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thoroughman, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Rapid Reshaping of Human Motor Generalization

Kurt A. Thoroughman and Jordan A. Taylor

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130

People routinely learn how to manipulate new tools or make new movements. This learning requires the transformation of sensed movement error into updates of predictive neural control. Here, we demonstrate that the richness of motor training determines not only what we learn but how we learn. Human subjects made reaching movements while holding a robotic arm whose perturbing forces changed directions at the same rate, twice as fast, or four times as fast as the direction of movement, therefore exposing subjects to environments of increasing complexity across movement space. Subjects learned all three environments and learned the low- and medium-complexity environments equally well. We found that subjects lessened their movement-by-movement adaptation and narrowed the spatial extent of generalization to match the environmental complexity. This result demonstrated that people can rapidly reshape the transformation of sense into motor prediction to best learn a new movement task. We then modeled this adaptation using a neural network and found that, to mimic human behavior, the modeled neuronal tuning of movement space needed to narrow and reduce gain with increased environmental complexity. Prominent theories of neural computation have hypothesized that neuronal tuning of space, which determines generalization, should remained fixed during learning so that a combination of neuronal outputs can underlie adaptation simply and flexibly. Here, we challenge those theories with evidence that the neuronal tuning of movement space changed within minutes of training.

Key words: adaptation; artificial intelligence; human; motor learning; motor control; memory formation; computational neuroscience; neural networks; generalization


Received May 3, 2005; revised August 16, 2005; accepted August 17, 2005.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Tanaka, T. J. Sejnowski, and J. W. Krakauer
Adaptation to Visuomotor Rotation Through Interaction Between Posterior Parietal and Motor Cortical Areas
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 2921 - 2932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J.-Y. Lee and N. Schweighofer
Dual Adaptation Supports a Parallel Architecture of Motor Memory
J. Neurosci., August 19, 2009; 29(33): 10396 - 10404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Darainy, A. A. G. Mattar, and D. J. Ostry
Effects of Human Arm Impedance on Dynamics Learning and Generalization
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2009; 101(6): 3158 - 3168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Tremblay, G. Houle, and D. J. Ostry
Specificity of Speech Motor Learning
J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2426 - 2434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. A. G. Mattar and D. J. Ostry
Modifiability of Generalization in Dynamics Learning
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3321 - 3329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. S. Fine and K. A. Thoroughman
Trial-by-Trial Transformation of Error Into Sensorimotor Adaptation Changes With Environmental Dynamics
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1392 - 1404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. A. Taylor and K. A. Thoroughman
Divided Attention Impairs Human Motor Adaptation But Not Feedback Control
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 317 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. E. Milner and M. R. Hinder
Position Information But Not Force Information Is Used in Adapting to Changes in Environmental Dynamics
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 526 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. S. Fine and K. A. Thoroughman
Motor Adaptation to Single Force Pulses: Sensitive to Direction but Insensitive to Within-Movement Pulse Placement and Magnitude
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 710 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-