QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, September 28, 2005, 25(39):8948-8953; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1771-05.2005

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thoroughman, K. A. Articles by Taylor, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thoroughman, K. A. Articles by Taylor, J. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Rapid Reshaping of Human Motor Generalization

Kurt A. Thoroughman and Jordan A. Taylor

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri 63130

People routinely learn how to manipulate new tools or make new movements. This learning requires the transformation of sensed movement error into updates of predictive neural control. Here, we demonstrate that the richness of motor training determines not only what we learn but how we learn. Human subjects made reaching movements while holding a robotic arm whose perturbing forces changed directions at the same rate, twice as fast, or four times as fast as the direction of movement, therefore exposing subjects to environments of increasing complexity across movement space. Subjects learned all three environments and learned the low- and medium-complexity environments equally well. We found that subjects lessened their movement-by-movement adaptation and narrowed the spatial extent of generalization to match the environmental complexity. This result demonstrated that people can rapidly reshape the transformation of sense into motor prediction to best learn a new movement task. We then modeled this adaptation using a neural network and found that, to mimic human behavior, the modeled neuronal tuning of movement space needed to narrow and reduce gain with increased environmental complexity. Prominent theories of neural computation have hypothesized that neuronal tuning of space, which determines generalization, should remained fixed during learning so that a combination of neuronal outputs can underlie adaptation simply and flexibly. Here, we challenge those theories with evidence that the neuronal tuning of movement space changed within minutes of training.

Key words: adaptation; artificial intelligence; human; motor learning; motor control; memory formation; computational neuroscience; neural networks; generalization

---

Received May 3, 2005; revised August 16, 2005; accepted August 17, 2005.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Tremblay, G. Houle, and D. J. Ostry Specificity of Speech Motor Learning J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2426 - 2434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. G. Mattar and D. J. Ostry Modifiability of Generalization in Dynamics Learning J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3321 - 3329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Fine and K. A. Thoroughman Trial-by-Trial Transformation of Error Into Sensorimotor Adaptation Changes With Environmental Dynamics J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1392 - 1404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Taylor and K. A. Thoroughman Divided Attention Impairs Human Motor Adaptation But Not Feedback Control J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 317 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Milner and M. R. Hinder Position Information But Not Force Information Is Used in Adapting to Changes in Environmental Dynamics J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 526 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Fine and K. A. Thoroughman Motor Adaptation to Single Force Pulses: Sensitive to Direction but Insensitive to Within-Movement Pulse Placement and Magnitude J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 710 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help