 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, January 26, 2005, 25(4):860-868; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2782-04.2005
Previous Article | Next Article
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Contrast Adaptation in Subthreshold and Spiking Responses of Mammalian Y-Type Retinal Ganglion Cells
Kareem A. Zaghloul,1 Kwabena Boahen,2 andJonathan B. Demb1,3,4 Departments of 1Neuroscience and 2Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, and Departments of 3Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and 4Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
Retinal ganglion cells adapt their responses to the amplitude of fluctuations around the mean light level, or the "contrast." But, in mammalian retina, it is not known whether adaptation arises exclusively at the level of synaptic inputs or whether there is also adaptation in the process of ganglion cell spike generation. Here, we made intracellular recordings from guinea pig Y-type ganglion cells and quantified changes in contrast sensitivity (gain) using a linear-nonlinear analysis. This analysis allowed us to measure adaptation in the presence of nonlinearities, such as the spike threshold, and to compare adaptation in subthreshold and spiking responses. At high contrast (0.30), relative to low contrast (0.10), gain reduced to 0.82 ± 0.016 (mean ± SEM) for the subthreshold response and to 0.61 ± 0.011 for the spiking response. Thus, there was an apparent reduction in gain between the subthreshold and spiking response of 0.74 ± 0.013. Control experiments suggested that the above effects could not be explained by an artifact of the intracellular recording conditions: extracellular recordings showed a gain change of 0.58 ± 0.022. For intracellular recordings, negative current reduced the spike output but did not affect the gain change in the subthreshold response: 0.80 ± 0.051. Thus, adaptation in the subthreshold response did not require spike-dependent conductances. We conclude that the contrast-dependent gain change in the spiking response can be explained by both a synaptic mechanism, as reflected by responses in the subthreshold potential, and an intrinsic mechanism in the ganglion cell related to spike generation.
Key words: gain control; membrane potential; action potential; intrinsic property; Y-cell;
-cell
Received July 12, 2004; revised November 17, 2004; accepted December 6, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:
C.-I Yeh, C. R. Stoelzel, C. Weng, and J.-M. Alonso
Functional Consequences of Neuronal Divergence Within the Retinogeniculate Pathway
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2009; 101(4): 2166 - 2185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
C. L. Passaglia, D. K. Freeman, and J. B. Troy
Effects of Remote Stimulation on the Modulated Activity of Cat Retinal Ganglion Cells
J. Neurosci., February 25, 2009; 29(8): 2467 - 2476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
D. L. Beaudoin, M. B. Manookin, and J. B. Demb
Distinct expressions of contrast gain control in parallel synaptic pathways converging on a retinal ganglion cell
J. Physiol., November 15, 2008; 586(22): 5487 - 5502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. B. Demb
Functional circuitry of visual adaptation in the retina
J. Physiol., September 15, 2008; 586(18): 4377 - 4384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
D. Kerschensteiner, H. Liu, C. W. Cheng, J. Demas, S. H. Cheng, C.-c. Hui, R. L. Chow, and R. O. L. Wong
Genetic Control of Circuit Function: Vsx1 and Irx5 Transcription Factors Regulate Contrast Adaptation in the Mouse Retina
J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2342 - 2352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
S. Bandyopadhyay, L. A. J. Reiss, and E. D. Young
Receptive Field for Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Neurons at Multiple Sound Levels
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3505 - 3515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
L. A. J. Reiss, S. Bandyopadhyay, and E. D. Young
Effects of Stimulus Spectral Contrast on Receptive Fields of Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Neurons
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2133 - 2143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
K. S. Gaudry and P. Reinagel
Contrast Adaptation in a Nonadapting LGN Model
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1287 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
K. S. Gaudry and P. Reinagel
Benefits of Contrast Normalization Demonstrated in Neurons and Model Cells
J. Neurosci., July 25, 2007; 27(30): 8071 - 8079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
K. A. Zaghloul, M. B. Manookin, B. G. Borghuis, K. Boahen, and J. B. Demb
Functional Circuitry for Peripheral Suppression in Mammalian Y-Type Retinal Ganglion Cells
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4327 - 4340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
D. L. Beaudoin, B. G. Borghuis, and J. B. Demb
Cellular Basis for Contrast Gain Control over the Receptive Field Center of Mammalian Retinal Ganglion Cells
J. Neurosci., March 7, 2007; 27(10): 2636 - 2645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
V. Bonin, V. Mante, and M. Carandini
The statistical computation underlying contrast gain control.
J. Neurosci., June 7, 2006; 26(23): 6346 - 6353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
V. Bonin, V. Mante, and M. Carandini
The Suppressive Field of Neurons in Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
J. Neurosci., November 23, 2005; 25(47): 10844 - 10856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. Carandini, J. B. Demb, V. Mante, D. J. Tolhurst, Y. Dan, B. A. Olshausen, J. L. Gallant, and N. C. Rust
Do We Know What the Early Visual System Does?
J. Neurosci., November 16, 2005; 25(46): 10577 - 10597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|