WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience MBF Bioscience Neurolucida
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, October 19, 2005, 25(42):9602-9612; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0879-05.2005

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hung, J.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hung, J.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, V.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Visual Selection and Posterior Parietal Cortex: Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Partial Report Analyzed by Bundesen's Theory of Visual Attention

June Hung,1,2,3 Jon Driver,1 and Vincent Walsh1

1Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom, 2Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom, and 3Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei 10507, Taiwan

Posterior parietal cortex (PPC) may contribute to visual selection by exerting top-down influences on visual processing. To seek direct evidence for this, we used 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over right or left PPC in nine healthy volunteers during a partial (selective) report task that allows quantitative assessment of top-down control and other parameters. Participants reported digits in a relevant color ("targets") but not those in an irrelevant color ("nontargets") from a brief masked display, in which a target could appear alone or together with an accompanying item (nontarget or target) in the same or opposite hemifield. Generally, a given target is identified better when presented with a nontarget than with another target, indicating top-down selection of task-relevant targets; this applied here with no rTMS or left PPC rTMS. However, rTMS over the right PPC changed the performance pattern. A left target no longer impeded report of a right target more strongly than did a left nontarget, whereas the greater impact of a right target than a right nontarget in disrupting report of a left target was increased. Formal analysis in terms of Bundesen's (1990) theory of visual attention indicated that right PPC rTMS diminished top-down control for the left hemifield while enhancing this for the right hemifield, particularly for bilateral two-item displays. These findings indicate a role for right PPC in top-down spatial selection, which applies even when the target is defined by a nonspatial property (here color).

Key words: parietal; transcranial magnetic stimulation; visual selectivity; extinction; spatial; attention


Received March 4, 2005; revised August 15, 2005; accepted September 6, 2005.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. Silvanto, N. Muggleton, N. Lavie, and V. Walsh
The Perceptual and Functional Consequences of Parietal Top-Down Modulation on the Visual Cortex
Cereb Cortex, May 30, 2008; (2008) bhn091v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Molenberghs, C. R. Gillebert, R. Peeters, and R. Vandenberghe
Convergence between Lesion-Symptom Mapping and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Spatially Selective Attention in the Intact Brain
J. Neurosci., March 26, 2008; 28(13): 3359 - 3373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. T. Sack, A. Kohler, S. Bestmann, D. E. J. Linden, P. Dechent, R. Goebel, and J. Baudewig
Imaging the Brain Activity Changes Underlying Impaired Visuospatial Judgments: Simultaneous fMRI, TMS, and Behavioral Studies
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2007; 17(12): 2841 - 2852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
J. O'Shea, N. G. Muggleton, A. Cowey, and V. Walsh
Human Frontal Eye Fields and Spatial Priming of Pop-out.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2007; 19(7): 1140 - 1151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. Babiloni, F. Vecchio, S. Rossi, A. De Capua, S. Bartalini, M. Ulivelli, and P. M. Rossini
Human Ventral Parietal Cortex Plays a Functional Role on Visuospatial Attention and Primary Consciousness. A Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2007; 17(6): 1486 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Silvanto, N. Lavie, and V. Walsh
Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye Fields Modulates Sensitivity of Extrastriate Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 941 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-