 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, October 26, 2005, 25(43):9907-9912; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2197-05.2005
Previous Article | Next Article 
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
The Temporal Impulse Response Underlying Saccadic Decisions
Casimir J. H. Ludwig,1
Iain D. Gilchrist,1
Eugene McSorley,2 and
Roland J. Baddeley1
1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TN, United Kingdom, and 2School of Psychology, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AL, United Kingdom
Models of perceptual decision making often assume that sensory evidence is accumulated over time in favor of the various possible decisions, until the evidence in favor of one of them outweighs the evidence for the others. Saccadic eye movements are among the most frequent perceptual decisions that the human brain performs. We used stochastic visual stimuli to identify the temporal impulse response underlying saccadic eye movement decisions. Observers performed a contrast search task, with temporal variability in the visual signals. In experiment 1, we derived the temporal filter observers used to integrate the visual information. The integration window was restricted to the first 100 ms after display onset. In experiment 2, we showed that observers cannot perform the task if there is no useful information to distinguish the target from the distractor within this time epoch. We conclude that (1) observers did not integrate sensory evidence up to a criterion level, (2) observers did not integrate visual information up to the start of the saccadic dead time, and (3) variability in saccade latency does not correspond to variability in the visual integration period. Instead, our results support a temporal filter model of saccadic decision making. The temporal impulse response identified by our methods corresponds well with estimates of integration times of V1 output neurons.
Key words: eye movement; saccade; vision; decision; superior colliculus; striate cortex
Received March 16, 2005;
revised August 23, 2005;
accepted September 12, 2005.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Cisek, G. A. Puskas, and S. El-Murr
Decisions in Changing Conditions: The Urgency-Gating Model
J. Neurosci.,
September 16, 2009;
29(37):
11560 - 11571.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. M. Ghose and I. T. Harrison
Temporal Precision of Neuronal Information in a Rapid Perceptual Judgment
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2009;
101(3):
1480 - 1493.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Sharika, A. Ramakrishnan, and A. Murthy
Control of Predictive Error Correction During a Saccadic Double-Step Task
J Neurophysiol,
November 1, 2008;
100(5):
2757 - 2770.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Ostendorf
Saccadic Eye Movements Illuminate Chronometry of Perceptual Localization
J. Neurosci.,
September 10, 2008;
28(37):
9090 - 9091.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Harwood, L. Madelain, R. J. Krauzlis, and J. Wallman
The Spatial Scale of Attention Strongly Modulates Saccade Latencies
J Neurophysiol,
April 1, 2008;
99(4):
1743 - 1757.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Kiani, T. D. Hanks, and M. N. Shadlen
Bounded Integration in Parietal Cortex Underlies Decisions Even When Viewing Duration Is Dictated by the Environment
J. Neurosci.,
March 19, 2008;
28(12):
3017 - 3029.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Palmer, S.-Y. Cheng, and E. Seidemann
Linking Neuronal and Behavioral Performance in a Reaction-Time Visual Detection Task
J. Neurosci.,
July 25, 2007;
27(30):
8122 - 8137.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|