 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, November 23, 2005, 25(47):11003-11013; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3305-05.2005
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Prediction and Decoding of Retinal Ganglion Cell Responses with a Probabilistic Spiking Model
Jonathan W. Pillow,1
Liam Paninski,2
Valerie J. Uzzell,3
Eero P. Simoncelli,1 and
E. J. Chichilnisky3
1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Center for Neural Science, and Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, New York 10003, 2Department of Statistics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, and 3The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California 92037
Sensory encoding in spiking neurons depends on both the integration of sensory inputs and the intrinsic dynamics and variability of spike generation. We show that the stimulus selectivity, reliability, and timing precision of primate retinal ganglion cell (RGC) light responses can be reproduced accurately with a simple model consisting of a leaky integrate-and-fire spike generator driven by a linearly filtered stimulus, a postspike current, and a Gaussian noise current. We fit model parameters for individual RGCs by maximizing the likelihood of observed spike responses to a stochastic visual stimulus. Although compact, the fitted model predicts the detailed time structure of responses to novel stimuli, accurately capturing the interaction between the spiking history and sensory stimulus selectivity. The model also accounts for the variability in responses to repeated stimuli, even when fit to data from a single (nonrepeating) stimulus sequence. Finally, the model can be used to derive an explicit, maximum-likelihood decoding rule for neural spike trains, thus providing a tool for assessing the limitations that spiking variability imposes on sensory performance.
Key words: retinal ganglion cell; spike trains; computational model; neural coding; spike timing; precision; decoding; variability; integrate and fire
Received Feb 23, 2005;
revised September 8, 2005;
accepted September 19, 2005.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Beaudoin, M. B. Manookin, and J. B. Demb
Distinct expressions of contrast gain control in parallel synaptic pathways converging on a retinal ganglion cell
J. Physiol.,
November 15, 2008;
586(22):
5487 - 5502.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. O. Sharpee, K. D. Miller, and M. P. Stryker
On the Importance of Static Nonlinearity in Estimating Spatiotemporal Neural Filters With Natural Stimuli
J Neurophysiol,
May 1, 2008;
99(5):
2496 - 2509.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. S. Gaudry and P. Reinagel
Contrast Adaptation in a Nonadapting LGN Model
J Neurophysiol,
September 1, 2007;
98(3):
1287 - 1296.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Doiron, A.-M. M. Oswald, and L. Maler
Interval Coding. II. Dendrite-Dependent Mechanisms
J Neurophysiol,
April 1, 2007;
97(4):
2744 - 2757.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Victor, E. M. Blessing, J. D. Forte, P. Buzas, and P. R. Martin
Response variability of marmoset parvocellular neurons
J. Physiol.,
February 15, 2007;
579(1):
29 - 51.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. B. Averbeck and L. M. Romanski
Probabilistic Encoding of Vocalizations in Macaque Ventral Lateral Prefrontal Cortex
J. Neurosci.,
October 25, 2006;
26(43):
11023 - 11033.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. M. Herz, T. Gollisch, C. K. Machens, and D. Jaeger
Modeling single-neuron dynamics and computations: a balance of detail and abstraction.
Science,
October 6, 2006;
314(5796):
80 - 85.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|