 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, March 15, 2006, 26(11):2881-2893; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3903-05.2006
Previous Article | Next Article
Development/Plasticity/Repair
Regeneration of Vestibular Otolith Afferents after Ototoxic Damage
Mridha Zakir andJ. David Dickman Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. J. David Dickman, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Box 8108, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, St. Louis, MO 63110. Email: ddickman{at}wustl.edu
Regeneration of receptor cells and subsequent functional recovery after damage in the auditory and vestibular systems of many vertebrates is well known. Spontaneous regeneration of mammalian hair cells does not occur. However, recent approaches provide hope for similar restoration of hearing and balance in humans after loss. Newly regenerated hair cells receive afferent terminal contacts, yet nothing is known about how reinnervation progresses or whether regenerated afferents finally develop normal termination fields. We hypothesized that neural regeneration in the vestibular otolith system would recapitulate the topographic phenotype of afferent innervation so characteristic of normal development. We used an ototoxic agent to produce complete vestibular receptor cell loss and epithelial denervation, and then quantitatively examined afferent regeneration at discrete periods up to 1 year in otolith maculas. Here, we report that bouton, dimorph, and calyx afferents all regenerate slowly at different time epochs, through a progressive temporal sequence. Furthermore, our data suggest that both the hair cells and their innervating afferents transdifferentiate from an early form into more advanced forms during regeneration. Finally, we show that regeneration remarkably recapitulates the topographic organization of afferent macular innervation, comparable with that developed through normative morphogenesis. However, we also show that regenerated terminal morphologies were significantly less complex than normal fibers. Whether these structural fiber changes lead to alterations in afferent responsiveness is unknown. If true, adaptive plasticity in the central neural processing of motion information would be necessitated, because it is known that many vestibular-related behaviors fully recover during regeneration.
Key words: regeneration; vestibular; receptor; motion detection; spatial orientation; afferent
Received Sept. 14, 2005; revised Jan. 25, 2006; accepted Jan. 27, 2006.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. J. David Dickman, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Box 8108, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, St. Louis, MO 63110. Email: ddickman{at}wustl.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
A. Haque, M. Zakir, and J. D. Dickman
Regeneration of Vestibular Horizontal Semicircular Canal Afferents in Pigeons
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 1274 - 1286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
V C Zingler, E Weintz, K Jahn, A Mike, D Huppert, N Rettinger, T Brandt, and M Strupp
Follow-up of vestibular function in bilateral vestibulopathy
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2008; 79(3): 284 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
A. Haque, M. Zakir, and J. D. Dickman
Recovery of Gaze Stability During Vestibular Regeneration
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 853 - 865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
S. G. Sadeghi, L. B. Minor, and K. E. Cullen
Response of Vestibular-Nerve Afferents to Active and Passive Rotations Under Normal Conditions and After Unilateral Labyrinthectomy
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1503 - 1514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|