The Journal of Neuroscience, April 12, 2006, 26(15):4026-4035; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4727-05.2006
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Persistent Responses to Brief Stimuli: Feedback Excitation among Brainstem Neurons
Wen-Chang Li,1
Stephen R. Soffe,1
Ervin Wolf,2 and
Alan Roberts1
1School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom, and 2Department of Anatomy, Medical and Health Science Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
Correspondence should be addressed to Alan Roberts, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom. Email: a.roberts{at}bristol.ac.uk
The ability of brief stimuli to trigger prolonged neuronal activity is a fundamental requirement in nervous systems, common to motor responses and short-term memory. Bistable membrane properties and network feedback excitation have both been proposed as suitable mechanisms to sustain such persistent responses. There is now good experimental evidence for membrane bistability. In contrast, the long-standing hypotheses based on positive feedback excitation have yet to be supported by direct evidence for mutual excitatory connections between appropriate neurons. In young frog tadpoles (Xenopus), we show that a small region of caudal hindbrain and rostral spinal cord is sufficient to generate prolonged swimming in response to a brief stimulus. We used paired whole-cell patch recordings to identify hindbrain neurons in this region that actively excite spinal neurons to drive sustained swimming. We show directly that some of these hindbrain neurons make reciprocal excitatory connections with each other. We use a population model of the hindbrain network to illustrate how feedback excitation can provide a robust mechanism to generate persistent responses. Our recordings provide direct evidence for feedback excitation among neurons within a network that drives a prolonged response. Its presence in a lower brain region early in development suggests that it is a basic feature of neuronal network design.
Key words: feedback; locomotion; reticulospinal; rhythm generation; synapses; Xenopus
Received Nov. 4, 2005;
revised Feb. 22, 2006;
accepted Feb. 25, 2006.
Correspondence should be addressed to Alan Roberts, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom. Email: a.roberts{at}bristol.ac.uk
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-C. Li, B. Sautois, A. Roberts, and S. R. Soffe
Reconfiguration of a Vertebrate Motor Network: Specific Neuron Recruitment and Context-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity
J. Neurosci.,
November 7, 2007;
27(45):
12267 - 12276.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. G. Stuart
Reflections on integrative and comparative movement neuroscience
Integr. Comp. Biol.,
October 1, 2007;
47(4):
482 - 504.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. R. Fernandez, J. D. T. Engbers, and R. W. Turner
Firing Dynamics of Cerebellar Purkinje Cells
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2007;
98(1):
278 - 294.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Jankowska and K. Stecina
Uncrossed actions of feline corticospinal tract neurones on lumbar interneurones evoked via ipsilaterally descending pathways
J. Physiol.,
April 1, 2007;
580(1):
133 - 147.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|