QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, July 19, 2006, 26(29):7718-7722; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1949-06.2006

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Meunier, M. Articles by Bachevalier, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Meunier, M. Articles by Bachevalier, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Brief Communications
Responses to Affective Stimuli in Monkeys with Entorhinal or Perirhinal Cortex Lesions

Martine Meunier,¹ Laetitia Cirilli,¹ and Jocelyne Bachevalier²

¹Institut des Neurosciences Cognitives de la Méditerranée, Unité Mixte de Recherche 6193, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Aix-Marseille Université, 13602 Marseille, France, and ²Yerkes National Primate Center and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30329

Correspondence should be addressed to Jocelyne Bachevalier, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, 954 Gatewood Road, Atlanta, GA 30329. Email: jbachev{at}emory.edu

Recent efforts to define the functions of the primate rhinal (entorhinal and perirhinal) cortical areas have focused on their interaction with the hippocampus in the mediation of normal memory. Less is known on the functional meaning of their strong connections to the amygdala, a key substrate for emotion. A previous study (Meunier and Bachevalier, 2002) showed evidence that complete rhinal ablations yield changes in monkeys' behavioral responses to affectively salient stimuli. Here, we studied monkeys with separate entorhinal or perirhinal ablations in the same paradigm, where responses were triggered by four stimuli: an unfamiliar human, a conspecific stimulus, a toy snake, and a familiar (generally rewarded) junk object. The two separate lesions produced similar changes, and each replicated the effects of complete rhinal lesions (i.e., attenuated affiliation and enhanced defense). Failure to modulate responses based on previous experience (i.e., memory difficulties) may explain these affective changes. This interpretation does not account, however, for the sparing of some memory-dependent modulations of defense, nor for the lack of correlation between the animals' affective changes and their own recognition memory performance. Alternatively, rhinal damage may introduce a negative bias in the risk assessment of affectively salient stimuli, a proposal more compatible with Gray and McNaughton's (2000) anxiety-centered view of medial temporal functions, than with prominent mnemonic/perceptual functional models of the hippocampal/rhinal duo. Reconciling the two perspectives may improve our understanding of rhinal functions.

Key words: social behavior; emotion; fear; anxiety; reward; hippocampus; amygdala

---

Received May 8, 2006; revised June 15, 2006; accepted June 16, 2006.

Correspondence should be addressed to Jocelyne Bachevalier, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, 954 Gatewood Road, Atlanta, GA 30329. Email: jbachev{at}emory.edu

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help