WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, August 23, 2006, 26(34):8767-8773; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1134-06.2006

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plack, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Drga, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plack, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Drga, V.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Masking by Inaudible Sounds and the Linearity of Temporal Summation

Christopher J. Plack,1 Andrew J. Oxenham,2 and Vit Drga3

1Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YF, United Kingdom, 2Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, and 3School of Psychology, University of St. Andrews, St. Mary’s College, St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JP, United Kingdom

Correspondence should be addressed to Christopher J. Plack, Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YF, UK. Email: c.plack{at}lancaster.ac.uk

Many natural sounds, including speech and animal vocalizations, involve rapid sequences that vary in spectrum and amplitude. Each sound within a sequence has the potential to affect the audibility of subsequent sounds in a process known as forward masking. Little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying forward masking, particularly in more realistic situations in which multiple sounds follow each other in rapid succession. A parsimonious hypothesis is that the effects of consecutive sounds combine linearly, so that the total masking effect is a simple sum of the contributions from the individual maskers. The experiment reported here tests a counterintuitive prediction of this linear-summation hypothesis, namely that a sound that itself is inaudible should, under certain circumstances, affect the audibility of subsequent sounds. The results show that, when two forward maskers are combined, the second of the two maskers can continue to produce substantial masking, even when it is completely masked by the first masker. Thus, inaudible sounds can affect the perception of subsequent sounds. A model incorporating instantaneous compression (reflecting the nonlinear response of the basilar membrane in the cochlea), followed by linear summation of the effects of the maskers, provides a good account of the data. Despite the presence of multiple sources of nonlinearity in the auditory system, masking effects by sequential sounds combine in a manner that is well captured by a time-invariant linear system.

Key words: hearing; auditory; psychophysics; temporal; adaptation; summation


Received Nov. 2, 2005; revised June 14, 2006; accepted July 5, 2006.

Correspondence should be addressed to Christopher J. Plack, Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YF, UK. Email: c.plack{at}lancaster.ac.uk






-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-