WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience PeproTech - Your Source for Neuroscience Research Reagents
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, September 6, 2006, 26(36):9239-9249; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1898-06.2006

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balan, P. F
Right arrow Articles by Gottlieb, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balan, P. F
Right arrow Articles by Gottlieb, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Integration of Exogenous Input into a Dynamic Salience Map Revealed by Perturbing Attention

Puiu F Balan1 and Jacqueline Gottlieb1,2

1Center for Neurobiology and Behavior and 2Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Jacqueline Gottlieb, Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Kolb Research Annex, Room 569, New York, NY 10032. Email: jg2141{at}columbia.edu

Although it is widely accepted that exogenous and voluntary factors jointly determine the locus of attention, the rules governing the integration of these factors are poorly understood. We investigated neural responses in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) to transient, distracting visual perturbations presented during task performance. Monkeys performed a covert search task in which they discriminated the orientation of a target embedded among distractors, and brief visual perturbations were presented at various moments and locations during task performance. LIP neurons responded to perturbations consisting of the appearance of new objects, as well as to abrupt changes in the color, luminance, or position of existing objects. The LIP response correlated with the bottom-up behavioral effects of different perturbation types. In addition, neurons showed two types of top-down modulations. One modulation was a context-specific multiplicative gain that affected perturbation, target, and distractor activity in a spatially nonspecific manner. Gain was higher in blocks of trials in which perturbations directly marked target location than in blocks in which they invariably appeared opposite the target, thus encoding a behavioral context defined by the statistical contingency between target and perturbation location. A second modulation reflected local competitive interactions with search-related activity, resulting in the converse effect: weaker perturbation-evoked responses if perturbations appeared at the location of the target than if they appeared opposite the target. Thus, LIP encodes an abstract dimension of salience, which is shaped by local and global top-down mechanisms. These interacting mechanisms regulate responsiveness to external input as a function of behavioral context and momentary task demands.

Key words: attention; exogenous; endogenous; parietal; context; competitive interactions


Received Feb. 1, 2006; revised July 20, 2006; accepted Aug. 1, 2006.

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Jacqueline Gottlieb, Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Kolb Research Annex, Room 569, New York, NY 10032. Email: jg2141{at}columbia.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
Y. B. Saalmann, I. N. Pigarev, and T. R. Vidyasagar
Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention: How Top-Down Feedback Highlights Relevant Locations
Science, June 15, 2007; 316(5831): 1612 - 1615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. J. Proulx and J. T. Serences
Searching for an Oddball: Neural Correlates of Singleton Detection Mode in Parietal Cortex
J. Neurosci., December 6, 2006; 26(49): 12631 - 12632.
[Full Text] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-