 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, September 20, 2006, 26(38):9761-9770; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5605-05.2006
Previous Article | Next Article
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Integrated Neural Processes for Defining Potential Actions and Deciding between Them: A Computational Model
Paul Cisek Department of Physiology, University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3J7
Correspondence should be addressed to Paul Cisek, Department of Physiology, University of Montréal, Case Postale 6128 Succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3J7. Email: paul.cisek{at}umontreal.ca
To successfully accomplish a behavioral goal such as reaching for an object, an animal must solve two related problems: to decide which object to reach and to plan the specific parameters of the movement. Traditionally, these two problems have been viewed as separate, and theories of decision making and motor planning have been developed primarily independently. However, neural data suggests that these processes involve the same brain regions and are performed in an integrated manner. Here, a computational model is described that addresses both the question of how different potential actions are specified and how the brain decides between them. In the model, multiple potential actions are simultaneously represented as continuous regions of activity within populations of cells in frontoparietal cortex. These representations engage in a competition for overt execution that is biased by modulatory influences from prefrontal cortex. The model neural populations exhibit activity patterns that correlate with both the spatial metrics of potential actions and their associated decision variables, in a manner similar to activities in parietal, prefrontal, and premotor cortex. The model therefore suggests an explanation for neural data that have been hard to account for in terms of serial theories that propose that decision making occurs before action planning. In addition to simulating the activity of individual neurons during decision tasks, the model also reproduces key aspects of the spatial and temporal statistics of human choices and makes a number of testable predictions.
Key words: decision making; planning; cognition; cerebral cortex; computational model; neural coding
Received Dec. 31, 2005; revised Aug. 11, 2006; accepted Aug. 14, 2006.
Correspondence should be addressed to Paul Cisek, Department of Physiology, University of Montréal, Case Postale 6128 Succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3J7. Email: paul.cisek{at}umontreal.ca
Related articles in J. Neurosci.:
- A New Unified Framework for Making and Implementing Decisions
- Sven Bestmann
J. Neurosci. 2006 26: 13121-13122.[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
R. Kiani, T. D. Hanks, and M. N. Shadlen
Bounded Integration in Parietal Cortex Underlies Decisions Even When Viewing Duration Is Dictated by the Environment
J. Neurosci., March 19, 2008; 28(12): 3017 - 3029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J.-H. Song, N. Takahashi, and R. M. McPeek
Target Selection for Visually Guided Reaching in Macaque
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 14 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
L. Lemus, A. Hernandez, R. Luna, A. Zainos, V. Nacher, and R. Romo
Neural correlates of a postponed decision report
PNAS, October 23, 2007; 104(43): 17174 - 17179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. Brozovic, A. Gail, and R. A. Andersen
Gain Mechanisms for Contextually Guided Visuomotor Transformations
J. Neurosci., September 26, 2007; 27(39): 10588 - 10596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. N. Tobler and T. Kalenscher
Awfully Afraid? Dissociating Decision- from Motor- and Sensory-Related Brain Activation during Perceptual Choices
J. Neurosci., June 6, 2007; 27(23): 6081 - 6082.
[Full Text] [PDF]
H. Scherberger and R. A. Andersen
Target Selection Signals for Arm Reaching in the Posterior Parietal Cortex
J. Neurosci., February 21, 2007; 27(8): 2001 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
S. Bestmann
A New Unified Framework for Making and Implementing Decisions
J. Neurosci., December 20, 2006; 26(51): 13121 - 13122.
[Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|