 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, January 25, 2006, 26(4):1293-1302; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4511-05.2006
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Rapid Brain Discrimination of Sounds of Objects
Micah M. Murray,1,2 *
Christian Camen,3 *
Sara L. Gonzalez Andino,4
Pierre Bovet,3 and
Stephanie Clarke1
1Neuropsychology Division and 2Radiology Service, The Functional Electrical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Hôpital Nestlé, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland, 3Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de lÉducation, Geneva University, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland, and 4The Functional Brain Mapping Laboratory, Neurology Department, Geneva University Hospital, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
Correspondence should be addressed to either Micah M. Murray or Stephanie Clarke, Neuropsychology Division, Hôpital Nestlé, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Avenue Pierre Decker 5, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. Email: micah.murray{at}chuv.ch or stephanie.clarke{at}chuv.ch
Electrical neuroimaging in humans identified the speed and spatiotemporal brain mechanism whereby sounds of living and man-made objects are discriminated. Subjects performed an "oddball" target detection task, selectively responding to sounds of either living or man-made objects on alternating blocks, which were controlled for in their spectrogram and harmonics-to-noise ratios between categories. Analyses were conducted on 64-channel auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) from nontarget trials. Comparing responses to sounds of living versus man-made objects, these analyses tested for modulations in local AEP waveforms, global response strength, and the topography of the electric field at the scalp. In addition, the local autoregressive average distributed linear inverse solution was applied to periods of observed modulations. Just 70 ms after stimulus onset, a common network of brain regions within the auditory "what" processing stream responded more strongly to sounds of man-made versus living objects, with differential activity within the right temporal and left inferior frontal cortices. Over the 155257 ms period, the duration of activity of a brain network, including bilateral temporal and premotor cortices, differed between categories of sounds. Responses to sounds of living objects peaked 12 ms later and the activity of the brain network active over this period was prolonged relative to that in response to sounds of man-made objects. The earliest task-related effects were observed at 100 ms poststimulus onset, placing an upper limit on the speed of cortical auditory object discrimination. These results provide critical temporal constraints on human auditory object recognition and semantic discrimination processes.
Key words: auditory evoked potential; AEP; object recognition; event-related potential; sound; what and where pathways; electrical neuroimaging; LAURA source estimation
Received Aug. 19, 2005;
revised Oct. 21, 2005;
accepted Dec. 13, 2005.
Correspondence should be addressed to either Micah M. Murray or Stephanie Clarke, Neuropsychology Division, Hôpital Nestlé, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Avenue Pierre Decker 5, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. Email: micah.murray{at}chuv.ch or stephanie.clarke{at}chuv.ch
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. Lewis, W. J. Talkington, N. A. Walker, G. A. Spirou, A. Jajosky, C. Frum, and J. A. Brefczynski-Lewis
Human Cortical Organization for Processing Vocalizations Indicates Representation of Harmonic Structure as a Signal Attribute
J. Neurosci.,
February 18, 2009;
29(7):
2283 - 2296.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Martuzzi, M. M. Murray, R. A. Meuli, J.-P. Thiran, P. P. Maeder, C. M. Michel, R. Grave de Peralta Menendez, and S. L. Gonzalez Andino
Methods for Determining Frequency- and Region-Dependent Relationships Between Estimated LFPs and BOLD Responses in Humans
J Neurophysiol,
January 1, 2009;
101(1):
491 - 502.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. F. Altmann, H. Nakata, Y. Noguchi, K. Inui, M. Hoshiyama, Y. Kaneoke, and R. Kakigi
Temporal Dynamics of Adaptation to Natural Sounds in the Human Auditory Cortex
Cereb Cortex,
June 1, 2008;
18(6):
1350 - 1360.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Noppeney, O. Josephs, J. Hocking, C. J. Price, and K. J. Friston
The Effect of Prior Visual Information on Recognition of Speech and Sounds
Cereb Cortex,
March 1, 2008;
18(3):
598 - 609.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. F. Altmann, O. Doehrmann, and J. Kaiser
Selectivity for Animal Vocalizations in the Human Auditory Cortex
Cereb Cortex,
November 1, 2007;
17(11):
2601 - 2608.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kaiser, T. Lennert, and W. Lutzenberger
Dynamics of Oscillatory Activity during Auditory Decision Making
Cereb Cortex,
October 1, 2007;
17(10):
2258 - 2267.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Murray, M. L. Imber, D. C. Javitt, and J. J. Foxe
Boundary Completion Is Automatic and Dissociable from Shape Discrimination.
J. Neurosci.,
November 15, 2006;
26(46):
12043 - 12054.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Ahveninen, I. P. Jaaskelainen, T. Raij, G. Bonmassar, S. Devore, M. Hamalainen, S. Levanen, F.-H. Lin, M. Sams, B. G. Shinn-Cunningham, et al.
Task-modulated "what" and "where" pathways in human auditory cortex
PNAS,
September 26, 2006;
103(39):
14608 - 14613.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|