 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, February 1, 2006, 26(5):1539-1550; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3807-05.2006
Previous Article | Next Article
Development/Plasticity/Repair
The Level and Integrity of Synaptic Input Regulates Dendrite Structure
Staci A. Sorensen andEdwin W. Rubel Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center and Graduate Program in Neurobiology and Behavior, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
Correspondence should be addressed to Edwin W. Rubel, Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center, Box 357923, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-9723. Email: rubel{at}u.washington.edu
How localized synaptic input regulates dendritic branch structure is not well understood. For these experiments, we used single-cell electroporation, live cell imaging, in vitro deafferentation, pharmacology, and electrophysiological stimulation to study how local alterations in synaptic input affect dendritic branch structure in nucleus laminaris (NL). We found that interrupting or modulating synaptic input to distinct sets of NL dendrites can regulate their structure on a very short timescale. Specifically, eliminating synaptic input by deafferenting only one set of the bitufted NL dendrites caused a selective reduction in the total dendritic branch length of the deafferented dendrites but relatively few changes in the normally innervated dendrites on the same cell. An analysis of individual dendritic branch changes demonstrated that both control and deafferented NL dendrites exhibit branch extension and retraction. However, the presence of intact synaptic inputs balanced these changes, maintaining the total dendritic branch length of control dendrites. When glutamate receptor signaling was blocked (DNQX and AP-5), NL neurons exhibited significant dendrite retraction, demonstrating that NL dendrite maintenance depends in part on presynaptic glutamatergic input. Electrophysiological experiments further confirmed that modulating the level of synaptic input regulates NL dendrite structure. Differential stimulation of the two sets of dendrites resulted in a selective reduction in the total dendritic branch length of the unstimulated dendrites and a selective increase in the total dendritic branch length of the stimulated dorsal dendrites. These results suggest that balanced activation of the two sets of NL dendrites is required to maintain the relative amount of dendritic surface area allotted to each input.
Key words: synaptic input; deafferentation; activity dependent; time lapse; development; maintenance
Received Sept. 8, 2005; revised Dec. 2, 2005; accepted Dec. 20, 2005.
Correspondence should be addressed to Edwin W. Rubel, Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center, Box 357923, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-9723. Email: rubel{at}u.washington.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
F. V. Chirila, K. C. Rowland, J. M. Thompson, and G. A. Spirou
Development of gerbil medial superior olive: integration of temporally delayed excitation and inhibition at physiological temperature
J. Physiol., October 1, 2007; 584(1): 167 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
C. K. Thompson, G. E. Bentley, and E. A. Brenowitz
Rapid seasonal-like regression of the adult avian song control system
PNAS, September 25, 2007; 104(39): 15520 - 15525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. A. Raven, E. C. T. Oh, A. Swaroop, and B. E. Reese
Afferent Control of Horizontal Cell Morphology Revealed by Genetic Respecification of Rods and Cones
J. Neurosci., March 28, 2007; 27(13): 3540 - 3547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
K. Haas, J. Li, and H. T. Cline
AMPA receptors regulate experience-dependent dendritic arbor growth in vivo
PNAS, August 8, 2006; 103(32): 12127 - 12131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|