WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, February 22, 2006, 26(8):2227-2234; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4329-05.2006

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maruyama, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Roper, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maruyama, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Roper, S. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Cellular/Molecular
Umami Responses in Mouse Taste Cells Indicate More than One Receptor

Yutaka Maruyama,1 Elizabeth Pereira,1 Robert F. Margolskee,3 Nirupa Chaudhari,1,2 and Stephen D. Roper1,2

1Department of Physiology and Biophysics and 2Program in Neuroscience, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33136, and 3Department of Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029

Correspondence should be addressed to S. D. Roper, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Avenue, Miami, FL 33136. Email: roper{at}miami.edu

A number of gustatory receptors have been proposed to underlie umami, the taste of L-glutamate, and certain other amino acids and nucleotides. However, the response profiles of these cloned receptors have not been validated against responses recorded from taste receptor cells that are the native detectors of umami taste. We investigated umami taste responses in mouse circumvallate taste buds in an intact slice preparation, using confocal calcium imaging. Approximately 5% of taste cells selectively responded to L-glutamate when it was focally applied to the apical chemosensitive tips of receptor cells. The concentration–response range for L-glutamate fell approximately within the physiologically relevant range for taste behavior in mice, namely 10 mM and above. Inosine monophosphate enhanced taste cell responses to L-glutamate, a characteristic feature of umami taste. Using pharmacological agents, ion substitution, and immunostaining, we showed that intracellular pathways downstream of receptor activation involve phospholipase C beta2. Each of the above features matches those predicted by studies of cloned and expressed receptors. However, the ligand specificity of each of the proposed umami receptors [taste metabotropic glutamate receptor 4, truncated metabotropic glutamate receptor 1, or taste receptor 1 (T1R1) and T1R3 dimers], taken alone, did not appear to explain the taste responses observed in mouse taste cells. Furthermore, umami responses were still observed in mutant mice lacking T1R3. A full explanation of umami taste transduction may involve novel combinations of the proposed receptors and/or as-yet-undiscovered taste receptors.

Key words: taste; receptor; signal transduction; glutamate; phospholipase; imaging; umami


Received Oct. 11, 2005; revised Jan. 10, 2006; accepted Jan. 11, 2006.

Correspondence should be addressed to S. D. Roper, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Avenue, Miami, FL 33136. Email: roper{at}miami.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
E. Jiang, G. Blonde, M. Garcea, and A. C. Spector
Greater Superficial Petrosal Nerve Transection in Rats does not Change Unconditioned Licking Responses to Putatively Sweet Taste Stimuli
Chem Senses, October 1, 2008; 33(8): 709 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Hacker, A. Laskowski, L. Feng, D. Restrepo, and K. Medler
Evidence for Two Populations of Bitter Responsive Taste Cells in Mice
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1503 - 1514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. M. Tomchik, S. Berg, J. W. Kim, N. Chaudhari, and S. D. Roper
Breadth of Tuning and Taste Coding in Mammalian Taste Buds
J. Neurosci., October 3, 2007; 27(40): 10840 - 10848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
L. M. Stone, J. Barrows, T. E. Finger, and S. C. Kinnamon
Expression of T1Rs and Gustducin in Palatal Taste Buds of Mice
Chem Senses, March 1, 2007; 32(3): 255 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
K. R. Trubey, S. Culpepper, Y. Maruyama, S. C. Kinnamon, and N. Chaudhari
Tastants evoke cAMP signal in taste buds that is independent of calcium signaling
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): C237 - C244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. A. DeFazio, G. Dvoryanchikov, Y. Maruyama, J. W. Kim, E. Pereira, S. D. Roper, and N. Chaudhari
Separate Populations of Receptor Cells and Presynaptic Cells in Mouse Taste Buds
J. Neurosci., April 12, 2006; 26(15): 3971 - 3980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-