The Journal of Neuroscience, March 1, 2006, 26(9):2443-2448; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3294-05.2006
Previous Article | Next Article 
Brief Communications
Operant Conditioning of Gill Withdrawal in Aplysia
Robert D. Hawkins,1,2
Gregory A. Clark,1,3 and
Eric R. Kandel1,2,3
1Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, 2New York State Psychiatric Institute, and 3Howard Hughes Medical Institute, New York, New York 10032
Correspondence should be addressed to Robert D. Hawkins, Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032. Email: rdh1{at}columbia.edu
A basic question in neuroscience is how different forms of learning are related. To further address that question, we examined whether gill withdrawal in Aplysia, which has already been studied extensively for neuronal mechanisms contributing to habituation, sensitization, and classical conditioning, also undergoes operant conditioning. Animals were run in pairs. During the initial training period, the contingent (experimental) animal received a siphon shock each time its gill relaxed below a criterion level, and the yoked control animal received a shock whenever the experimental animal did, regardless of its own gill position. This was followed by an extinction period when there was no shock, a retraining period when both animals were contingent, and another extinction period. The experimental animals spent more time with their gills contracted above the criterion level than did the control animals during each period, demonstrating operant conditioning. The type of gill behavior modified by learning shifted over time: the experimental animals had a larger increase in the frequency and duration of spontaneous contractions than did the control animals during the first but not the last extinction period and a larger increase in the level of tonic contraction during the last but not the first extinction period. Because many of the neurons controlling spontaneous and tonic gill withdrawal have already been identified, it should now be possible to examine the cellular locus and mechanism of operant conditioning and compare them with those for other forms of learning of the same behavior.
Key words: operant conditioning; Aplysia; gill withdrawal; spontaneous; tonic; conditioning
Received Aug. 5, 2005;
revised Jan. 19, 2006;
accepted Jan. 22, 2006.
Correspondence should be addressed to Robert D. Hawkins, Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032. Email: rdh1{at}columbia.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Nargeot, C. Petrissans, and J. Simmers
Behavioral and In Vitro Correlates of Compulsive-Like Food Seeking Induced by Operant Conditioning in Aplysia
J. Neurosci.,
July 25, 2007;
27(30):
8059 - 8070.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Bray, S. Shimojo, and J. P. O'Doherty
Direct Instrumental Conditioning of Neural Activity Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Reward Feedback
J. Neurosci.,
July 11, 2007;
27(28):
7498 - 7507.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. Aragona and R. M. Carelli
Dynamic neuroplasticity and the automation of motivated behavior.
Learn. Mem.,
September 1, 2006;
13(5):
558 - 559.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|