The Journal of Neuroscience, March 14, 2007, 27(11):2987-2998; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5072-06.2007
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Time Course of Precision in Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements of Monkeys
Leslie C. Osborne,1,3
Sonja S. Hohl,3,4
William Bialek,6 and
Stephen G. Lisberger1,2,3,4,5
1Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology, 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 3W. M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, 4Neuroscience Graduate Program, and 5Department of Physiology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0444, and 6Joseph Henry Laboratories of Physics and Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Leslie C. Osborne, Department of Physiology, Box 0444, 513 Parnassus Avenue, Room HSE-802A, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0444. Email: osborne{at}phy.ucsf.edu
To evaluate the nature and possible sources of variation in sensorymotor behavior, we measured the signal-to-noise ratio for the initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements as a function of time and computed thresholds that indicate how well the pursuit system discriminates small differences in the direction, speed, or time of onset of target motion. Thresholds improved rapidly as a function of time and came close to their minima during the interval when smooth eye movement is driven only by visual motion inputs. Many features of the data argued that motor output and sensory discrimination are limited by the same noise source. Pursuit thresholds reached magnitudes similar to those for perception: <23° of direction,
1115% of target speed, and 8 ms of change in the time of onset of target motion. Pursuit and perceptual thresholds had similar dependencies on the duration of the motion stimulus and showed similar effects of target speed. The evolution of information about direction of target motion followed the same time course in pursuit behavior and in a previously reported sample of neuronal responses from extrastriate area MT. Changing the form of the sensory input while keeping the motor response fixed had significant effects on the signal-to-noise ratio in pursuit for direction discrimination, whereas holding the sensory input constant while changing the combination of muscles used for the motor output did not. We conclude that noise in sensory processing of visual motion provides the major source of variation in the initiation of pursuit.
Key words: visual motion; signal-to-noise ratio; sensory discrimination; motor noise; extrastriate cortex; MT; information theory
Received Nov. 22, 2006;
revised Jan. 26, 2007;
accepted Feb. 14, 2007.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Leslie C. Osborne, Department of Physiology, Box 0444, 513 Parnassus Avenue, Room HSE-802A, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0444. Email: osborne{at}phy.ucsf.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. van Beers
The Sources of Variability in Saccadic Eye Movements
J. Neurosci.,
August 15, 2007;
27(33):
8757 - 8770.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|