 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, January 10, 2007, 27(2):366-370; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3183-06.2007
Previous Article | Next Article
Brief Communications
Motion Integration by Neurons in Macaque MT Is Local, Not Global
Najib J. Majaj, Matteo Carandini, andJ. Anthony Movshon Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003
Correspondence should be addressed to Najib J. Majaj, Center for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, Room 809, New York, NY 10003. Email: najib{at}cns.nyu.edu
Direction-selective neurons in primary visual cortex have small receptive fields that encode the motions of local features. These motions often differ from the motion of the object to which they belong and must therefore be integrated elsewhere. A candidate site for this integration is visual cortical area MT (V5), in which cells with large receptive fields compute the motion of patterns. Previous studies of motion integration in MT have used stimuli that fill the receptive field, and thus do not test whether motion information is really integrated across this whole area. For each MT neuron, we identified two regions ("patches") within the receptive field that were approximately equally effective in driving responses. We then measured responses to plaids whose component gratings overlapped within a patch, and compared them with responses to the same component gratings presented in separate patches. Cells that were selective for the direction of motion of the whole pattern when the gratings overlapped lost this selectivity when the gratings were separated and became selective instead for the direction of motion of the individual components. If MT cells simply pooled all of the inputs that endow them with a receptive field, they would encode all of the motions in the receptive field as belonging to a single object. Our results indicate instead that critical elements of the computations underlying pattern-direction selectivity in MT are done locally, on a scale smaller than the whole receptive field.
Key words: vision; visual motion; extrastriate; MT; V5; pattern; component
Received July 25, 2006; revised Nov. 21, 2006; accepted Nov. 22, 2006.
Correspondence should be addressed to Najib J. Majaj, Center for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, Room 809, New York, NY 10003. Email: najib{at}cns.nyu.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
G. M. Ghose and I. T. Harrison
Temporal Precision of Neuronal Information in a Rapid Perceptual Judgment
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2009; 101(3): 1480 - 1493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
X. Huang, T. D. Albright, and G. R. Stoner
Stimulus Dependency and Mechanisms of Surround Modulation in Cortical Area MT
J. Neurosci., December 17, 2008; 28(51): 13889 - 13906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
K. Moutoussis and S. Zeki
Motion processing, directional selectivity, and conscious visual perception in the human brain
PNAS, October 21, 2008; 105(42): 16362 - 16367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
D. I. Braun, N. Mennie, C. Rasche, A. C. Schutz, M. J. Hawken, and K. R. Gegenfurtner
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements to Isoluminant Targets
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1287 - 1300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
C. Cadieu, M. Kouh, A. Pasupathy, C. E. Connor, M. Riesenhuber, and T. Poggio
A Model of V4 Shape Selectivity and Invariance
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1733 - 1750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|