QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, January 10, 2007, 27(2):366-370; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3183-06.2007

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Majaj, N. J. Articles by Movshon, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Majaj, N. J. Articles by Movshon, J. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Brief Communications
Motion Integration by Neurons in Macaque MT Is Local, Not Global

Najib J. Majaj, Matteo Carandini, and J. Anthony Movshon

Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003

Correspondence should be addressed to Najib J. Majaj, Center for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, Room 809, New York, NY 10003. Email: najib{at}cns.nyu.edu

Direction-selective neurons in primary visual cortex have small receptive fields that encode the motions of local features. These motions often differ from the motion of the object to which they belong and must therefore be integrated elsewhere. A candidate site for this integration is visual cortical area MT (V5), in which cells with large receptive fields compute the motion of patterns. Previous studies of motion integration in MT have used stimuli that fill the receptive field, and thus do not test whether motion information is really integrated across this whole area. For each MT neuron, we identified two regions ("patches") within the receptive field that were approximately equally effective in driving responses. We then measured responses to plaids whose component gratings overlapped within a patch, and compared them with responses to the same component gratings presented in separate patches. Cells that were selective for the direction of motion of the whole pattern when the gratings overlapped lost this selectivity when the gratings were separated and became selective instead for the direction of motion of the individual components. If MT cells simply pooled all of the inputs that endow them with a receptive field, they would encode all of the motions in the receptive field as belonging to a single object. Our results indicate instead that critical elements of the computations underlying pattern-direction selectivity in MT are done locally, on a scale smaller than the whole receptive field.

Key words: vision; visual motion; extrastriate; MT; V5; pattern; component

---

Received July 25, 2006; revised Nov. 21, 2006; accepted Nov. 22, 2006.

Correspondence should be addressed to Najib J. Majaj, Center for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, Room 809, New York, NY 10003. Email: najib{at}cns.nyu.edu

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Cadieu, M. Kouh, A. Pasupathy, C. E. Connor, M. Riesenhuber, and T. Poggio A Model of V4 Shape Selectivity and Invariance J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1733 - 1750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help