WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, January 10, 2007, 27(2):371-378; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4421-06.2007

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. X
Right arrow Articles by Ranganath, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. X
Right arrow Articles by Ranganath, C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Reinforcement Learning Signals Predict Future Decisions

Michael X Cohen1,2 and Charan Ranganath2

1Department of Epileptology and Center for Mind and Brain, University of Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany, and 2Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616

Correspondence should be addressed to Michael X Cohen, Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA 95616. Email: mcohen{at}ucdavis.edu

Optimal behavior in a competitive world requires the flexibility to adapt decision strategies based on recent outcomes. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that this flexibility emerges through a reinforcement learning process, in which reward prediction errors are used dynamically to adjust representations of decision options. We recorded event-related brain potentials (ERPs) while subjects played a strategic economic game against a computer opponent to evaluate how neural responses to outcomes related to subsequent decision-making. Analyses of ERP data focused on the feedback-related negativity (FRN), an outcome-locked potential thought to reflect a neural prediction error signal. Consistent with predictions of a computational reinforcement learning model, we found that the magnitude of ERPs after losing to the computer opponent predicted whether subjects would change decision behavior on the subsequent trial. Furthermore, FRNs to decision outcomes were disproportionately larger over the motor cortex contralateral to the response hand that was used to make the decision. These findings provide novel evidence that humans engage a reinforcement learning process to adjust representations of competing decision options.

Key words: reward prediction error; ERN; decision-making; reinforcement learning; dopamine; event-related potential


Received March 9, 2006; revised Nov. 26, 2006; accepted Nov. 27, 2006.

Correspondence should be addressed to Michael X Cohen, Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA 95616. Email: mcohen{at}ucdavis.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. van der Helden, M. A. S. Boksem, and J. H. G. Blom
The Importance of Failure: Feedback-Related Negativity Predicts Motor Learning Efficiency
Cereb Cortex, October 19, 2009; (2009) bhp224v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cogn Affect Behav NeurosciHome page
C. B. Holroyd, O. E. Krigolson, R. Baker, S. Lee, and J. Gibson
When is an error not a prediction error? An electrophysiological investigation
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, March 1, 2009; 9(1): 59 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Thevarajah, A. Mikulic, and M. C. Dorris
Role of the Superior Colliculus in Choosing Mixed-Strategy Saccades
J. Neurosci., February 18, 2009; 29(7): 1998 - 2008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. B. Mars, S. Debener, T. E. Gladwin, L. M. Harrison, P. Haggard, J. C. Rothwell, and S. Bestmann
Trial-by-Trial Fluctuations in the Event-Related Electroencephalogram Reflect Dynamic Changes in the Degree of Surprise
J. Neurosci., November 19, 2008; 28(47): 12539 - 12545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Mikulic and M. C. Dorris
Temporal and Spatial Allocation of Motor Preparation During a Mixed-Strategy Game
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 2101 - 2108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cogn Affect Behav NeurosciHome page
M. X. COHEN
Neurocomputational mechanisms of reinforcement-guided learning in humans: A review
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, June 1, 2008; 8(2): 113 - 125.
[Abstract] [PDF]



-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-