 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, May 23, 2007, 27(21):5559-5570; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5117-06.2007
Previous Article | Next Article
Cellular/Molecular
Linking Synaptic Plasticity and Spike Output at Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses onto Cerebellar Purkinje Cells
Wolfgang Mittmann andMichael Häusser Wolfson Institute for Biomedical Research and Department of Physiology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
Correspondence should be addressed to Michael Häusser, Wolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. Email: m.hausser{at}ucl.ac.uk
Understanding the relationship between synaptic plasticity and neuronal output is essential if we are to understand how plasticity is encoded in neural circuits. In the cerebellar cortex, motor learning is thought to be implemented by long-term depression (LTD) of excitatory parallel fiber (PF) to Purkinje cell synapses triggered by climbing fiber (CF) input. However, theories of motor learning generally neglect the contribution of plasticity of inhibitory inputs to Purkinje cells. Here we describe how CF-induced plasticity of both excitatory and inhibitory inputs is reflected in Purkinje cell spike output. We show that coactivation of the CF with PF input and interneuron input leads not only to LTD of PF synapses but also to comparable, "balanced" LTD of evoked inhibitory inputs. These two forms of plasticity have opposite effects on the spike output of Purkinje cells, with the number and timing of spikes sensitively reflecting the degree of plasticity. We used dynamic clamp to evaluate plasticity-induced changes in spike responses to sequences of excitation and feedforward inhibition of varied relative and absolute amplitude. Balanced LTD of both excitatory and inhibitory components decreased the net spike output of Purkinje cells only for inputs with small inhibitory components, whereas for inputs with a larger proportion of feedforward inhibition CF-triggered LTD resulted in an increase in the net spike output. Thus, the net effect of CF-triggered plasticity on Purkinje cell output depends on the balance of excitation and feedforward inhibition and can paradoxically increase cerebellar output, contrary to current theories of cerebellar motor learning.
Key words: climbing fiber; Purkinje neuron; synaptic plasticity; LTD; cerebellum; spike timing
Received Nov. 26, 2006; revised March 28, 2007; accepted April 17, 2007.
Correspondence should be addressed to Michael Häusser, Wolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. Email: m.hausser{at}ucl.ac.uk
Related articles in J. Neurosci.:
- This Week in The Journal
J. Neurosci. 2007 27: i.[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
J. T. Walter and and K. Khodakhah
The advantages of linear information processing for cerebellar computation
PNAS, March 17, 2009; 106(11): 4471 - 4476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
W. Xu and S. A. Edgley
Climbing fibre-dependent changes in Golgi cell responses to peripheral stimulation
J. Physiol., October 15, 2008; 586(20): 4951 - 4959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. J. Sjostrom, E. A. Rancz, A. Roth, and M. Hausser
Dendritic Excitability and Synaptic Plasticity
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2008; 88(2): 769 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. E. Lewis, B. Lindner, B. Laliberte, and S. Groothuis
Control of neuronal firing by dynamic parallel fiber feedback: implications for electrosensory reafference suppression
J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2007; 210(24): 4437 - 4447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|