 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, May 23, 2007, 27(21):5706-5718; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4743-06.2007
Previous Article | Next Article
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
A Dynamic Nonlinearity and Spatial Phase Specificity in Macaque V1 Neurons
Patrick E. Williams andRobert M. Shapley New York University Center for Neural Science, New York, New York 10003
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Patrick E. Williams, New York University Center for Neural Science, 4 Washington Place, Room 809, New York, NY 10003. Email: patrickw{at}cns.nyu.edu
While studying the visual response dynamics of neurons in the macaque primary visual cortex (V1), we found a nonlinearity of temporal response that influences the visual functions of V1 neurons. Simple cells were recorded in all layers of V1; the nonlinearity was strongest in neurons located in layer 2/3. We recorded the spike responses to optimal sinusoidal gratings that were displayed for 100 ms, a temporal step response. The step responses were measured at many spatial phases of the grating stimulus. To judge whether simple cell behavior was consistent with linear temporal integration, the decay of the 100 ms step response at the preferred spatial phase was used to predict the step response at the opposite spatial phase. Responses in layers 4B and 4C were mostly consistent with a linear-plus-static-nonlinearity cascade model. However, this was not true in layer 2/3 where most cells had little or no step responses at the opposite spatial phase. Many layer 2/3 cells had transient preferred-phase responses but did not respond at the offset of the opposite-phase stimuli, indicating a dynamic nonlinearity. A different stimulus sequence, rapidly presented random sinusoids, also produced the same effect, with layer 2/3 simple cells exhibiting elevated spike rates in response to stimuli at one spatial phase but not 180° away. The presence of a dynamic nonlinearity in the responses of V1 simple cells indicates that first-order analyses often capture only a fraction of neuronal behavior. The visual implication of our results is that simple cells in layer 2/3 are spatial phase-sensitive detectors that respond to contrast boundaries of one sign but not the opposite.
Key words: striate cortex; spatial phase; nonlinearity; dynamic; simple cells; layer 2/3
Received Oct. 31, 2006; revised April 18, 2007; accepted April 19, 2007.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Patrick E. Williams, New York University Center for Neural Science, 4 Washington Place, Room 809, New York, NY 10003. Email: patrickw{at}cns.nyu.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
C.-I Yeh, D. Xing, P. E. Williams, and R. M. Shapley
Stimulus ensemble and cortical layer determine V1 spatial receptive fields
PNAS, August 25, 2009; 106(34): 14652 - 14657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Y. Chen, S. Anand, S. Martinez-Conde, S. L. Macknik, Y. Bereshpolova, H. A. Swadlow, and J.-M. Alonso
The linearity and selectivity of neuronal responses in awake visual cortex
J Vis, August 1, 2009; 9(9): 12 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
B. J. Malone and D. L. Ringach
Dynamics of Tuning in the Fourier Domain
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 239 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|