 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, August 8, 2007, 27(32):8517-8524; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1677-07.2007
Previous Article | Next Article
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Match–Mismatch Processes Underlie Human Hippocampal Responses to Associative Novelty
Dharshan Kumaran andEleanor A. Maguire Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
Correspondence should be addressed to Dharshan Kumaran, Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, UCL, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Email: d.kumaran{at}fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk
The hippocampus has long been proposed to play a critical role in novelty detection through its ability to act as a comparator between past and present experience. A recent study provided evidence for this hypothesis by characterizing hippocampal responses to sequence novelty, a type of associative novelty where familiar items appear in a new temporal order. Here, we ask whether a hippocampal match–mismatch (i.e., comparator) mechanism operates selectively to identify the violation of predictions within the temporal domain or instead also underlies the processing of associative novelty in other domains (e.g., spatial). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and a repetition paradigm in which subjects viewed sequences of objects presented in distinct locations on the screen and performed an incidental target detection task. The left hippocampus exhibited a pattern of activity consistent with that of an associative match–mismatch detector, with novelty signals generated only in conditions where one contextual component was novel and the other repeated. In contrast, right hippocampal activation signaled the presence of objects in familiar locations. Our results suggest that hippocampal match–mismatch computations constitute a general mechanism underpinning the processing of associative novelty. These findings support a model in which hippocampal mismatch signals rely critically on the recall of previous experience, a process that only occurs when novel sensory inputs overlap significantly with stored representations. More generally, the current study also offers insights into how the hippocampus automatically represents the spatiotemporal context of our experiences, a function that may relate to its role in episodic memory.
Key words: fMRI; hippocampus; associative novelty; match–mismatch; comparator; memory
Received April 13, 2007; revised May 21, 2007; accepted June 21, 2007.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dharshan Kumaran, Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, UCL, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Email: d.kumaran{at}fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk
This article has been cited by other articles:
H. Lehn, H.-A. Steffenach, N. M. van Strien, D. J. Veltman, M. P. Witter, and A. K. Haberg
A Specific Role of the Human Hippocampus in Recall of Temporal Sequences
J. Neurosci., March 18, 2009; 29(11): 3475 - 3484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
K. Schon, Y. T. Quiroz, M. E. Hasselmo, and C. E. Stern
Greater Working Memory Load Results in Greater Medial Temporal Activity at Retrieval
Cereb Cortex, February 18, 2009; (2009) bhp006v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
K. Duncan, C. Curtis, and L. Davachi
Distinct Memory Signatures in the Hippocampus: Intentional States Distinguish Match and Mismatch Enhancement Signals
J. Neurosci., January 7, 2009; 29(1): 131 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. P. Karlsson and L. M. Frank
Network Dynamics Underlying the Formation of Sparse, Informative Representations in the Hippocampus
J. Neurosci., December 24, 2008; 28(52): 14271 - 14281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|