The Journal of Neuroscience, September 26, 2007, 27(39):10333-10344; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1692-07.2007
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Stimulus Feature Selectivity in Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons in Primary Visual Cortex
Jessica A. Cardin,
Larry A. Palmer, and
Diego Contreras
Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106
Correspondence should be addressed to Diego Contreras, Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 215 Stemmler Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19106-6074. Email: diegoc{at}mail.med.upenn.edu
Although several lines of evidence suggest that stimulus selectivity in somatosensory and visual cortices is critically dependent on unselective inhibition, particularly in the thalamorecipient layer 4, no comprehensive comparison of the responses of excitatory and inhibitory cells has been conducted. Here, we recorded intracellularly from a large population of regular spiking (RS; presumed excitatory) and fast spiking (FS; presumed inhibitory) cells in layers 2–6 of primary visual cortex. In layer 4, where selectivity for orientation and spatial frequency first emerges, we found no untuned FS cells. Instead, the tuning of the spike output of layer 4 FS cells was significantly but moderately broader than that of RS cells. However, the tuning of the underlying synaptic responses was not different, indicating that the difference in spike-output selectivity resulted from differences in the transformation of synaptic input into firing rate. Layer 4 FS cells exhibited significantly lower input resistance and faster time constants than layer 4 RS cells, leading to larger and faster membrane potential (Vm) fluctuations. FS cell Vm fluctuations were more broadly tuned than those of RS cells and matched spike-output tuning, suggesting that the broader spike tuning of these cells was driven by visually evoked synaptic noise. These differences were not observed outside of layer 4. Thus, cell type-specific differences in stimulus feature selectivity at the first level of cortical sensory processing may arise as a result of distinct biophysical properties that determine the dynamics of synaptic integration.
Key words: intracellular; orientation; spatial frequency; synaptic noise; tuning; time constant
Received Aug. 16, 2006;
revised July 15, 2007;
accepted July 17, 2007.
Correspondence should be addressed to Diego Contreras, Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 215 Stemmler Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19106-6074. Email: diegoc{at}mail.med.upenn.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. J. Priebe
The Relationship between Subthreshold and Suprathreshold Ocular Dominance in Cat Primary Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci.,
August 20, 2008;
28(34):
8553 - 8559.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Niell and M. P. Stryker
Highly Selective Receptive Fields in Mouse Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci.,
July 23, 2008;
28(30):
7520 - 7536.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. I. Buia and P. H. Tiesinga
Role of Interneuron Diversity in the Cortical Microcircuit for Attention
J Neurophysiol,
May 1, 2008;
99(5):
2158 - 2182.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Gur and D. M. Snodderly
Physiological differences between neurons in layer 2 and layer 3 of primary visual cortex (V1) of alert macaque monkeys
J. Physiol.,
May 1, 2008;
586(9):
2293 - 2306.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|