The Journal of Neuroscience, October 31, 2007, 27(44):11842-11846; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3516-07.2007
Previous Article | Next Article 
Symposia and Mini-Symposia
Biomimetic Brain Machine Interfaces for the Control of Movement
Andrew H. Fagg,1
Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos,3,4,5
Victor de Lafuente,6
Karen A. Moxon,7
Shamim Nemati,2
James M. Rebesco,8
Ranulfo Romo,6
Sara A. Solla,8,9
Jake Reimer,3
Dennis Tkach,4
Eric A. Pohlmeyer,8,10 and
Lee E. Miller8,10
1School of Computer Science and 2Department of Mathematics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, 3Committee on Neurobiology, 4Committee on Computational Neuroscience, and 5Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, 6Institute of Cellular Physiology, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, 04510, Mexico, 7School of Biomedical Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, 8Department of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, and Departments of 9Physics and Astronomy and 10Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
Correspondence should be addressed to Lee E. Miller, Department of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611. Email: lm{at}northwestern.edu
Quite recently, it has become possible to use signals recorded simultaneously from large numbers of cortical neurons for real-time control. Such brain machine interfaces (BMIs) have allowed animal subjects and human patients to control the position of a computer cursor or robotic limb under the guidance of visual feedback. Although impressive, such approaches essentially ignore the dynamics of the musculoskeletal system, and they lack potentially critical somatosensory feedback. In this mini-symposium, we will initiate a discussion of systems that more nearly mimic the control of natural limb movement. The work that we will describe is based on fundamental observations of sensorimotor physiology that have inspired novel BMI approaches. We will focus on what we consider to be three of the most important new directions for BMI development related to the control of movement. (1) We will present alternative methods for building decoders, including structured, nonlinear models, the explicit incorporation of limb state information, and novel approaches to the development of decoders for paralyzed subjects unable to generate an output signal. (2) We will describe the real-time prediction of dynamical signals, including joint torque, force, and EMG, and the real-time control of physical plants with dynamics like that of the real limb. (3) We will discuss critical factors that must be considered to incorporate somatosensory feedback to the BMI user, including its potential benefits, the differing representations of sensation and perception across cortical areas, and the changes in the cortical representation of tactile events after spinal injury.
Key words: brain machine interface; monkey; movement; EMG; electromyogram; motor cortex; muscle; muscle paralysis; somatosensory cortex; spinal cord injury
Received Aug. 2, 2007;
revised Sept. 5, 2007;
accepted Sept. 5, 2007.
Correspondence should be addressed to Lee E. Miller, Department of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611. Email: lm{at}northwestern.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Radhakrishnan, S. N. Baker, and A. Jackson
Learning a Novel Myoelectric-Controlled Interface Task
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2008;
100(4):
2397 - 2408.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|