The Journal of Neuroscience, December 5, 2007, 27(49):13430-13435; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4320-07.2007
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
A Selective Role for Neuronal Activity Regulated Pentraxin in the Processing of Sensory-Specific Incentive Value
Alexander W. Johnson,1,2 *
Hans S. Crombag,1,2 *
Kogo Takamiya,3,5
Jay M. Baraban,3,4
Peter C. Holland,1,2
Richard L. Huganir,3,5 and
Irving M. Reti3,4
1Neurogenetics and Behavior Center and 2Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, 3Solomon Snyder Department of Neuroscience, 4Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, and 5Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Alexander W. Johnson, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Neurogenetics and Behavior Center, Johns Hopkins University, Ames Hall, Room 108, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218. Email: awj{at}jhu.edu
Neuronal activity regulated pentraxin (Narp) is a secreted neuronal product which clusters AMPA receptors and regulates excitatory synaptogenesis. Although Narp is selectively enriched in brain, its role in behavior is not known. As Narp is expressed prominently in limbic regions, we examined whether Narp deletion affects performance on tasks used to assess motivational consequences of food-rewarded learning. Narp knock-out (KO) mice were unimpaired in learning simple pavlovian discriminations, instrumental lever pressing, and in acquisition of at least two aspects of pavlovian incentive learning, conditioned reinforcement and pavlovian–instrumental transfer. In contrast, Narp deletion resulted in a substantial deficit in the ability to use specific outcome expectancies to modulate instrumental performance in a devaluation task. In this task, mice were trained to respond on two levers for two different rewards. After training, mice were prefed with one of the two rewards, devaluing it. Responding on both levers was then assessed in extinction. Whereas control mice showed a significant preference in responding on the lever associated with the nondevalued reward, Narp KO mice responded equally on both levers, failing to suppress responding on the lever associated with the devalued reward. Both groups consumed more of the nondevalued reward in a subsequent choice test, indicating Narp KO mice could distinguish between the rewards themselves. These data suggest Narp has a selective role in processing sensory-specific information necessary for appropriate devaluation performance, but not in general motivational effects of reward-predictive cues on performance.
Key words: reward; immediate early gene; knock-out; mice; pavlovian to instrumental transfer; conditioned reinforcement; reinforcer devaluation
Received Aug. 10, 2007;
revised Oct. 18, 2007;
accepted Oct. 18, 2007.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Alexander W. Johnson, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Neurogenetics and Behavior Center, Johns Hopkins University, Ames Hall, Room 108, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218. Email: awj{at}jhu.edu