 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, January 31, 2007, 27(5):1082-1089; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3223-06.2007
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Selective Visual Attention to Emotion
Harald T. Schupp,1
Jessica Stockburger,1
Maurizio Codispoti,2
Markus Junghöfer,3
Almut I. Weike,4 and
Alfons O. Hamm4
1Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany, 2Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy, 3Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany, and 4Department of Psychology, University of Greifswald, 17487 Greifswald, Germany
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Harald T. Schupp, Institute of Psychology, University of Konstanz, P.O. Box D36, 78457 Konstanz, Germany. Email: Harald.Schupp{at}uni-konstanz.de
Visual attention can be voluntarily directed toward stimuli and is attracted by stimuli that are emotionally significant. The present study explored the case when both processes coincide and attention is directed to emotional stimuli. Participants viewed a rapid and continuous stream of high-arousing erotica and mutilation stimuli as well as low-arousing control images. Each of the three stimulus categories served in separate runs as target or nontarget category. Event-related brain potential measures revealed that the interaction of attention and emotion varied for specific processing stages. The effects of attention and emotional significance operated additively during perceptual encoding indexed by negative-going potentials over posterior regions ( 200350 ms after stimulus onset). In contrast, thought to reflect the process of stimulus evaluation, P3 target effects ( 400600 ms after stimulus onset) were markedly augmented when erotica and mutilation compared with control stimuli were the focus of attention. Thus, emotion potentiated attention effects specifically during later stages of processing. These findings suggest to specify the interaction of attention and emotion in distinct processing stages.
Key words: attention; emotion; ERP; posterior negative potential; P3; late positive potential
Received April 4, 2006;
revised Nov. 7, 2006;
accepted Nov. 28, 2006.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Harald T. Schupp, Institute of Psychology, University of Konstanz, P.O. Box D36, 78457 Konstanz, Germany. Email: Harald.Schupp{at}uni-konstanz.de
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. R. Kuperberg, D. A. Kreher, A. Swain, D. C. Goff, and D. J. Holt
Selective Emotional Processing Deficits to Social Vignettes in Schizophrenia: An ERP Study
Schizophr Bull,
June 29, 2009;
(2009)
sbp018v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Hinojosa, L. Carretie, M. A. Valcarcel, C. Mendez-Bertolo, and M. A. Pozo
Electrophysiological differences in the processing of affective information in words and pictures
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci,
June 1, 2009;
9(2):
173 - 189.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Van Overwalle, S. Van den Eede, K. Baetens, and M. Vandekerckhove
Trait inferences in goal-directed behavior: ERP timing and localization under spontaneous and intentional processing
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci,
June 1, 2009;
4(2):
177 - 190.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Schacht and W. Sommer
Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci,
March 1, 2009;
9(1):
28 - 43.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Muller, S. K. Andersen, and A. Keil
Time Course of Competition for Visual Processing Resources between Emotional Pictures and Foreground Task
Cereb Cortex,
August 1, 2008;
18(8):
1892 - 1899.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. SCHACHT, K. WERHEID, and W. SOMMER
The appraisal of facial beauty is rapid but not mandatory
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci,
June 1, 2008;
8(2):
132 - 142.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Talmi, A. K. Anderson, L. Riggs, J. B. Caplan, and M. Moscovitch
Immediate memory consequences of the effect of emotion on attention to pictures
Learn. Mem.,
March 5, 2008;
15(3):
172 - 182.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|