WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience MBF Stereo Investigator
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, March 5, 2008, 28(10):2651-2658; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4781-07.2008

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robleto, K.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, R. F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robleto, K.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, R. F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Extinction of a Classically Conditioned Response: Red Nucleus and Interpositus

Karla Robleto and Richard F. Thompson

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089

Correspondence should be addressed to Karla Robleto, University of Southern California, 3641 Watt Way, HNB-522, Los Angeles, CA 90089. Email: krobleto{at}usc.edu

It is well established that the cerebellum and its associated circuitry are essential for classical conditioning of the eyeblink response and other discrete motor responses (e.g., limb flexion, head turn, etc.) learned with an aversive unconditioned stimulus. However, brain mechanisms underlying extinction of these responses are still relatively unclear. Behavioral studies have demonstrated extinction to be an active learning process distinct from acquisition. Accordingly, this current understanding of extinction has guided neural studies that have tried to identify possible brain structures that could support this new learning. However, whether extinction engages the same brain sites necessary for acquisition is not yet clear. This poses an overriding problem for understanding brain mechanisms necessary for extinction because such analysis cannot be done without first identifying brain sites and pathways involved in this phenomenon. Equally elusive is the validity of a behavioral theory of extinction that can account for the properties of extinction. In this study, we looked at the involvement of the interpositus and the red nucleus in extinction. Results show that, although inactivation of both nuclei blocks response expression, only inactivation of the interpositus has a detrimental effect on extinction. Moreover, this detrimental effect was completely removed when inactivation of the interpositus was paired with electrical stimulation of the red nucleus. These findings speak to the important role of cerebellar structures in the extinction of discrete motor responses and provide important insight as to the validity of a particular theory of extinction.

Key words: extinction; cerebellum; classical conditioning; learning; eyeblink; red nucleus; interpositus; inferior olive


Received July 11, 2007; revised Dec. 21, 2007; accepted Jan. 19, 2008.

Correspondence should be addressed to Karla Robleto, University of Southern California, 3641 Watt Way, HNB-522, Los Angeles, CA 90089. Email: krobleto{at}usc.edu






-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-