WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP
The Journal of Neuroscience, June 4, 2008, 28(23):5954-5958; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0578-08.2008

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wallis, T. S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wallis, T. S. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Perceived Size and Spatial Coding

Derek H. Arnold, Annette Birt, and Thomas S. A. Wallis

School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia

Correspondence should be addressed to Derek H. Arnold at the above address. Email: darnold{at}psy.uq.edu.au

Images of the same physical dimensions on the retina can appear to represent different-sized objects. One reason for this is that the human visual system can take viewing distance into account when judging apparent size. Sequentially presented images can also prompt spatial coding interactions. Here we show, using a spatial coding phenomenon (the tilt aftereffect) in tandem with viewing distance cues, that the tuning of such interactions is not simply determined by the physical dimensions of retinal input. Rather, we find that they are contingent on apparent size. Our data therefore reveal that spatial coding interactions in human vision are modulated by processes involved in the determination of apparent size.

Key words: spatial coding; perceived size; retinotopy; tilt aftereffect; size distance invariance; perception

Received Oct. 15, 2007; revised April 9, 2008; accepted April 12, 2008.

Correspondence should be addressed to Derek H. Arnold at the above address. Email: darnold{at}psy.uq.edu.au






 -
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help
-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-