QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, August 20, 2008, 28(34):8477-8488; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2046-08.2008

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Escobar, G. Articles by Stepanyants, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Escobar, G. Articles by Stepanyants, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Structural Plasticity of Circuits in Cortical Neuropil

Gina Escobar, ^* Tarec Fares, ^* and Armen Stepanyants

Department of Physics and Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Complex Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Correspondence should be addressed to Armen Stepanyants, Department of Physics, Northeastern University, 110 Forsyth Street, Boston, MA 02115. Email: a.stepanyants{at}neu.edu

Learning and memory formation in the brain depend on the plasticity of neural circuits. In the adult and developing cerebral cortex, this plasticity can result from the formation and elimination of dendritic spines. New synaptic contacts appear in the neuropil where the gaps between axonal and dendritic branches can be bridged by dendritic spines. Such sites are termed potential synapses. Here, we describe a theoretical framework for the analysis of spine remodeling plasticity. We provide a quantitative description of two models of spine remodeling in which the presence of a bouton is either required or not for the formation of a new synapse. We derive expressions for the density of potential synapses in the neuropil, the connectivity fraction, which is the ratio of actual to potential synapses, and the number of structurally different circuits attainable with spine remodeling. We calculate these parameters in mouse occipital cortex, rat CA1, monkey V1, and human temporal cortex. We find that, on average, a dendritic spine can choose among 4–7 potential targets in rodents and 10–20 potential targets in primates. The potential of neuropil for structural circuit remodeling is highest in rat CA1 (7.1–8.6 bits/µm³) and lowest in monkey V1 (1.3–1.5 bits/µm³). We also evaluate the lower bound of neuron selectivity in the choice of synaptic partners. Postsynaptic excitatory neurons in rodents make synaptic contacts with >21–30% of presynaptic axons encountered with new spine growth. Primate neurons appear to be more selective, making synaptic connections with >7–15% of encountered axons.

Key words: filling fraction; connectivity fraction; potential synapse; structural plasticity; structural entropy; spine length

---

Received May 2, 2008; revised June 16, 2008; accepted June 18, 2008.

Correspondence should be addressed to Armen Stepanyants, Department of Physics, Northeastern University, 110 Forsyth Street, Boston, MA 02115. Email: a.stepanyants{at}neu.edu

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Fares and A. Stepanyants Cooperative synapse formation in the neocortex PNAS, September 22, 2009; 106(38): 16463 - 16468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help