QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, August 27, 2008, 28(35):8765-8771; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1953-08.2008

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lewis-Peacock, J. A. Articles by Postle, B. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lewis-Peacock, J. A. Articles by Postle, B. R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Temporary Activation of Long-Term Memory Supports Working Memory

Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock and Bradley R. Postle

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Correspondence should be addressed to Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1202 West Johnson Street, Madison, WI 53706. Email: lewispeacock{at}wisc.edu

This study describes a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of humans engaged in long-term memory (LTM) and working memory tasks. A pattern classifier learned to identify patterns of brain activity associated with viewing and making judgments about three categories of pictures (famous people, famous locations, and common objects). The evaluation of these stimuli relied on perception and long-term semantic and/or episodic memories. We investigated whether this classifier could successfully decode brain activity from a subsequent delayed paired-associate recognition working memory task that required the short-term retention of the same stimuli. We reasoned that the LTM-trained classifier would be able to decode delay-period activity only if that activity reflected, to some extent, the temporary activation of LTM. Our results demonstrated successful decoding: delay-period activity from a distributed network of brain regions matched learned patterns of activity for task-relevant stimuli to a greater extent than for task-irrelevant stimuli. In varying degrees throughout the delay, activity reflected the target (a retrospective code) and its associate (a prospective code) with considerable variability among subjects. Although prefrontal cortex (PFC) demonstrated category-specific patterns of activity during the LTM task, these patterns were not reinstated in PFC during the working memory task. We conclude that the short-term retention of information can be supported by the temporary reactivation of LTM representations.

Key words: memory; long-term memory; working memory; paired association; fMRI; pattern classification

---

Received March 17, 2008; revised July 14, 2008; accepted July 25, 2008.

Correspondence should be addressed to Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1202 West Johnson Street, Madison, WI 53706. Email: lewispeacock{at}wisc.edu

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Woloszyn and D. L. Sheinberg Neural Dynamics in Inferior Temporal Cortex during a Visual Working Memory Task J. Neurosci., April 29, 2009; 29(17): 5494 - 5507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help