QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, October 15, 2008, 28(42):10663-10673; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5479-07.2008

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wagner, M. J. Articles by Smith, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wagner, M. J. Articles by Smith, M. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Shared Internal Models for Feedforward and Feedback Control

Mark J. Wagner¹ and Maurice A. Smith^1,2

¹School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and ²Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

Correspondence should be addressed to Maurice A. Smith, Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 29 Oxford Street, 325 Pierce Hall, Cambridge, MA 02138. Email: mas{at}seas.harvard.edu

A child often learns to ride a bicycle in the driveway, free of unforeseen obstacles. Yet when she first rides in the street, we hope that if a car suddenly pulls out in front of her, she will combine her innate goal of avoiding an accident with her learned knowledge of the bicycle, and steer away or brake. In general, when we train to perform a new motor task, our learning is most robust if it updates the rules of online error correction to reflect the rules and goals of the new task. Here we provide direct evidence that, after a new feedforward motor adaptation, motor feedback responses to unanticipated errors become precisely task appropriate, even when such errors were never experienced during training. To study this ability, we asked how, if at all, do online responses to occasional, unanticipated force pulses during reaching arm movements change after adapting to altered arm dynamics? Specifically, do they change in a task-appropriate manner? In our task, subjects learned novel velocity-dependent dynamics. However, occasional force-pulse perturbations produced unanticipated changes in velocity. Therefore, after adaptation, task-appropriate responses to unanticipated pulses should compensate corresponding changes in velocity-dependent dynamics. We found that after adaptation, pulse responses precisely compensated these changes, although they were never trained to do so. These results provide evidence for a smart feedback controller which automatically produces responses specific to the learned dynamics of the current task. To accomplish this, the neural processes underlying feedback control must (1) be capable of accurate real-time state prediction for velocity via a forward model and (2) have access to recently learned changes in internal models of limb dynamics.

Key words: motor learning; feedback control; motor control; optimal feedback control; adaptation; reaching arm movements

---

Received Oct. 12, 2007; revised Aug. 1, 2008; accepted Aug. 5, 2008.

Correspondence should be addressed to Maurice A. Smith, Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 29 Oxford Street, 325 Pierce Hall, Cambridge, MA 02138. Email: mas{at}seas.harvard.edu

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Kurtzer, J. A. Pruszynski, and S. H. Scott Long-Latency Responses During Reaching Account for the Mechanical Interaction Between the Shoulder and Elbow Joints J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 3004 - 3015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Crevecoeur, J.-L. Thonnard, and P. Lefevre Optimal Integration of Gravity in Trajectory Planning of Vertical Pointing Movements J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 786 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Gritsenko, S. Yakovenko, and J. F. Kalaska Integration of Predictive Feedforward and Sensory Feedback Signals for Online Control of Visually Guided Movement J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2009; 102(2): 914 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Braun, A. Aertsen, D. M. Wolpert, and C. Mehring Learning Optimal Adaptation Strategies in Unpredictable Motor Tasks J. Neurosci., May 20, 2009; 29(20): 6472 - 6478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Herman, M. R. Harwood, and J. Wallman Saccade Adaptation Specific to Visual Context J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2009; 101(4): 1713 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help