WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, November 12, 2008, 28(46):11806-11813; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3796-08.2008

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nadim, F.
Right arrow Articles by Linster, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nadim, F.
Right arrow Articles by Linster, C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Symposia and Mini-Symposia
State Dependence of Network Output: Modeling and Experiments

Farzan Nadim,1 Vladimir Brezina,2 Alain Destexhe,3 and Christiane Linster4

1New Jersey Institute of Technology and Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey 07102, 2Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, 3Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Gif sur Yvette 91198, France, and 4Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

Correspondence should be addressed to Farzan Nadim, Rutgers University, Department of Biological Sciences, 195 University Avenue, Newark, NJ 07102. Email: farzan{at}njit.edu

Emerging experimental evidence suggests that both networks and their component neurons respond to similar inputs differently, depending on the state of network activity. The network state is determined by the intrinsic dynamical structure of the network and may change as a function of neuromodulation, the balance or stochasticity of synaptic inputs to the network, and the history of network activity. Much of the knowledge on state-dependent effects comes from comparisons of awake and sleep states of the mammalian brain. Yet, the mechanisms underlying these states are difficult to unravel. Several vertebrate and invertebrate studies have elucidated cellular and synaptic mechanisms of state dependence resulting from neuromodulation, sensory input, and experience. Recent studies have combined modeling and experiments to examine the computational principles that emerge when network state is taken into account; these studies are highlighted in this article. We discuss these principles in a variety of systems (mammalian, crustacean, and mollusk) to demonstrate the unifying theme of state dependence of network output.

Key words: network; neuromodulation; noise; sensory neurons; motor control; olfactory; stomatogastric; Aplysia; computer


Received Aug. 6, 2008; revised Sept. 1, 2008; accepted Sept. 1, 2008.

Correspondence should be addressed to Farzan Nadim, Rutgers University, Department of Biological Sciences, 195 University Avenue, Newark, NJ 07102. Email: farzan{at}njit.edu






-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-