QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, December 3, 2008, 28(49):13194-13201; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2915-08.2008

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zeithamova, D. Articles by Schnyer, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zeithamova, D. Articles by Schnyer, D. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Dissociable Prototype Learning Systems: Evidence from Brain Imaging and Behavior

Dagmar Zeithamova,^1,2 W. Todd Maddox,^1,2 and David M. Schnyer^1,2

¹Institute for Neuroscience and ²Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712

Correspondence should be addressed to Dagmar Zeithamova, 1 University Station A8000, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712. Email: zeithamova{at}mail.utexas.edu

The neural underpinnings of prototype learning are not well understood. A major source of confusion is that two versions of the prototype learning task have been used interchangeably in the literature; one where participants learn to categorize exemplars derived from two prototypes (A/B task), and one where participants learn to categorize exemplars derived from one prototype and noncategorical exemplars (A/non-A). We report results from an fMRI study of A/B and A/non-A prototype learning that allows for a direct contrast of the two learning methods. Accuracy in the two tasks did not correlate within subject despite equivalent average difficulty. The fMRI results revealed neural activation in a network of regions consistent with episodic memory retrieval for the A/B task while greater activation of a nondeclarative learning network was observed for the A/non-A task. The results demonstrate that learning in these two tasks is mediated by different neural systems and that recruitment of each system is dictated by the context of learning rather than the actual category structure.

Key words: category learning; declarative memory; functional MRI; medial temporal lobe; perceptual learning; striatum

---

Received June 24, 2008; revised Oct. 29, 2008; accepted Oct. 30, 2008.

Correspondence should be addressed to Dagmar Zeithamova, 1 University Station A8000, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712. Email: zeithamova{at}mail.utexas.edu

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help