QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, December 10, 2008, 28(50):13703-13711; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4270-08.2008

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Christianson, J. P. Articles by Maier, S. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Christianson, J. P. Articles by Maier, S. F.

 Previous Article

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
The Sensory Insular Cortex Mediates the Stress-Buffering Effects of Safety Signals But Not Behavioral Control

John P. Christianson, Alexander M. Benison, Joshua Jennings, Emilee K. Sandsmark, Jose Amat, Richard D. Kaufman, Michael V. Baratta, Evan D. Paul, Serge Campeau, Linda R. Watkins, Daniel S. Barth, and Steven F. Maier

Department of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309

Correspondence should be addressed to John P. Christianson, Department of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, UCB 345, Boulder, CO 80309. Email: john.christianson{at}colorado.edu

Safety signals are learned cues that predict stress-free periods whereas behavioral control is the ability to modify a stressor by behavioral actions. Both serve to attenuate the effects of stressors such as uncontrollable shocks. Internal and external cues produced by a controlling behavior are followed by a stressor-free interval, and so it is possible that safety learning is fundamental to the effect of control. If this is the case then behavioral control and safety should recruit the same neural machinery. Interestingly, safety signals that prevented a behavioral outcome of stressor exposure that is also blocked by control (reduced social exploration) failed to inhibit activity in the dorsal raphé nucleus or use the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, the mechanisms by which behavioral control operates. However, bilateral lesions to a region of posterior insular cortex, termed the "sensory insula," prevented the effect of safety but not of behavioral control, providing a double-dissociation. These results indicate that stressor-modulators can recruit distinct neural circuitry and imply a critical role of the sensory insula in safety learning.

Key words: rat; learned safety; conditioned inhibition; anxiety; somatosensory cortex; auditory cortex; evoked potentials

---

Received Sept. 5, 2008; revised Oct. 21, 2008; accepted Nov. 7, 2008.

Correspondence should be addressed to John P. Christianson, Department of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, UCB 345, Boulder, CO 80309. Email: john.christianson{at}colorado.edu

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help