The Journal of Neuroscience, December 17, 2008, 28(51):13775-13785; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3541-08.2008
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Frontal Cortex Subregions Play Distinct Roles in Choices between Actions and Stimuli
Peter H. Rudebeck,1
Timothy E. Behrens,1
Steven W. Kennerley,2
Mark G. Baxter,1
Mark J. Buckley,1
Mark E. Walton,1 and
Matthew F. S. Rushworth1
1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom, and 2Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720
Correspondence should be addressed to Peter H. Rudebeck at his present address: Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health–National Institutes of Health, Building 49, Suite 1B80, 49 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-4415. Email: rudebeckp{at}mail.nih.gov
The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) has been implicated in reinforcement-guided decision making, error monitoring, and the reversal of behavior in response to changing circumstances. The anterior cingulate cortex sulcus (ACCS), however, has also been implicated in similar aspects of behavior. Dissociating the unique functions of these areas would improve our understanding of the decision-making process. The effect of selective OFC lesions on how monkeys used the history of reinforcement to guide choices of either particular actions or particular stimuli was studied and compared with the effects of ACCS lesions. Both lesions disrupted decision making, but their effects were differentially modulated by the dependence on action– or stimulus–value contingencies. OFC lesions caused a deficit in stimulus but not action selection, whereas ACCS lesions had the opposite effect, disrupting action but not stimulus selection. Furthermore, OFC lesions that have previously been found to impair decision making when deterministic stimulus–reward contingencies are switched were found to cause a more general learning impairment in more naturalistic situations in which reward was stochastic. Both OFC and ACCS are essential for reinforcement-guided decision making rather than just error monitoring or behavioral reversal. The OFC and ACCS are both, however, more concerned with learning and making decisions, but their roles in selecting between stimulus and action values are distinct.
Key words: reward; prefrontal cortex; learning; macaque; decision; cingulate
Received July 28, 2008;
revised Oct. 14, 2008;
accepted Nov. 3, 2008.
Correspondence should be addressed to Peter H. Rudebeck at his present address: Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health–National Institutes of Health, Building 49, Suite 1B80, 49 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-4415. Email: rudebeckp{at}mail.nih.gov
Related articles in J. Neurosci.:
- This Week in The Journal
J. Neurosci. 2008 28: i.
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. G. Ghahremani, J. Monterosso, J. D. Jentsch, R. M. Bilder, and R. A. Poldrack
Neural Components Underlying Behavioral Flexibility in Human Reversal Learning
Cereb Cortex,
November 13, 2009;
(2009)
bhp247v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Buckley, F. A. Mansouri, H. Hoda, M. Mahboubi, P. G. F. Browning, S. C. Kwok, A. Phillips, and K. Tanaka
Dissociable Components of Rule-Guided Behavior Depend on Distinct Medial and Prefrontal Regions
Science,
July 3, 2009;
325(5936):
52 - 58.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. L. Croxson, M. E. Walton, J. X. O'Reilly, T. E. J. Behrens, and M. F. S. Rushworth
Effort-Based Cost-Benefit Valuation and the Human Brain
J. Neurosci.,
April 8, 2009;
29(14):
4531 - 4541.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|