WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, December 31, 2008, 28(53):14422-14427; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4734-08.2008

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tunik, E.
Right arrow Articles by Adamovich, S. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tunik, E.
Right arrow Articles by Adamovich, S. V.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Brief Communications
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Frontal Operculum and Supramarginal Gyrus Disrupts Planning of Outcome-Based Hand–Object Interactions

Eugene Tunik,1,2 On-Yee Lo,2 and Sergei V. Adamovich1,3

1Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey 07107, 2Department of Physical Therapy, New York University, New York, New York 10010, and 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, New Jersey 07102

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Eugene Tunik, Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, 65 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ 07107. Email: tunikeu{at}umdnj.edu

Behavioral data suggest that goals inform the selection of motor commands during planning. We investigated the neural correlates that mediate planning of goal-oriented actions by asking 10 healthy subjects to prepare either a goal-specific movement toward a common object (a cup), with the intent of grasping-to-pour (liquid into it) or grasping-to-move (to another location) the object, or performing a non-object-oriented stimulus-response task (move a finger). Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was administered on 50% of trials to the supramarginal gyrus (SMG), anterior intraparietal sulcus, inferior frontal gyrus opercularis (IFGo), and triangularis during motor planning. Stimulation to SMG and IFGo caused a significant delay in planning goal-oriented actions but not responses to an arbitrary stimulus. Despite the delay, movement execution was not affected, suggesting that the motor plan remained intact. Our data implicate the SMG and IFGo in planning goal-oriented hand–object interactions.

Key words: motor control; reach-to-grasp; premotor; parietal; motor; motor intention


Received Oct. 2, 2008; revised Oct. 31, 2008; accepted Nov. 7, 2008.

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Eugene Tunik, Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, 65 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ 07107. Email: tunikeu{at}umdnj.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
R. H. Desai, J. R. Binder, L. L. Conant, and M. S. Seidenberg
Activation of Sensory-Motor Areas in Sentence Comprehension
Cereb Cortex, June 22, 2009; (2009) bhp115v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-