WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, April 8, 2009, 29(14):4531-4541; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4515-08.2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Croxson, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rushworth, M. F. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Croxson, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rushworth, M. F. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Effort-Based Cost–Benefit Valuation and the Human Brain

Paula L. Croxson,1,2 * Mark E. Walton,1,2 * Jill X. O'Reilly,1,2 Timothy E. J. Behrens,1,2 and Matthew F. S. Rushworth1,2

1Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom, and 2Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom

Correspondence should be addressed to either Mark Walton or Matthew Rushworth, Department of Experimental Psychology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK. Email: mark.walton{at}psy.ox.ac.uk or Email: matthew.rushworth{at}psy.ox.ac.uk

In both the wild and the laboratory, animals' preferences for one course of action over another reflect not just reward expectations but also the cost in terms of effort that must be invested in pursuing the course of action. The ventral striatum and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACCd) are implicated in the making of cost–benefit decisions in the rat, but there is little information about how effort costs are processed and influence calculations of expected net value in other mammals including humans. We performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging study to determine whether and where activity in the human brain was available to guide effort-based cost–benefit valuation. Subjects were scanned while they performed a series of effortful actions to obtain secondary reinforcers. At the beginning of each trial, subjects were presented with one of eight different visual cues that they had learned indicated how much effort the course of action would entail and how much reward could be expected at its completion. Cue-locked activity in the ventral striatum and midbrain reflected the net value of the course of action, signaling the expected amount of reward discounted by the amount of effort to be invested. Activity in ACCd also reflected the interaction of both expected reward and effort costs. Posterior orbitofrontal and insular activity, however, only reflected the expected reward magnitude. The ventral striatum and anterior cingulate cortex may be the substrate of effort-based cost–benefit valuation in primates as well as in rats.


Received Sept. 18, 2008; revised Feb. 27, 2009; accepted March 6, 2009.

Correspondence should be addressed to either Mark Walton or Matthew Rushworth, Department of Experimental Psychology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK. Email: mark.walton{at}psy.ox.ac.uk or Email: matthew.rushworth{at}psy.ox.ac.uk






-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-