QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, April 29, 2009, 29(17):5476-5482; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0116-09.2009

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mugge, W. Articles by van der Helm, F. C. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mugge, W. Articles by van der Helm, F. C. T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Sensory Weighting of Force and Position Feedback in Human Motor Control Tasks

Winfred Mugge,^1 * Jasper Schuurmans,^1 * Alfred C. Schouten,^1,2 and Frans C. T. van der Helm^1,2

¹Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands, and ²Laboratory of Biomechanical Engineering, Institute for Biomedical Technology, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands

Correspondence should be addressed to Winfred Mugge, Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands. Email: w.mugge{at}tudelft.nl

In daily life humans integrate force and position feedback from mechanoreceptors, proprioception, and vision. With handling relatively soft, elastic objects, force and position are related and can be integrated to improve the accuracy of an estimate of either one. Sensory weighting between different sensory systems (e.g., vision and proprioception) has been extensively studied. This study investigated whether similar weighting can be found within the proprioceptive sensory system, more specifically between the modalities force and position. We hypothesized that sensory weighting is governed by object stiffness: position feedback is weighted heavier on soft objects (large deflections), while force feedback is weighted heavier on stiff objects (small deflections). Subjects were instructed to blindly reproduce either position or force while holding a one degree of freedom haptic manipulator that simulated a linear spring with one of four predetermined stiffnesses. In catch trials the spring was covertly replaced by a nonlinear spring. The difference in force (F) and position (X) between the regular and the catch trials revealed the sensory weighting between force and position feedback. A maximum likelihood estimation model predicted that: (1) task instruction did not affect the outcome measures, and (2) force feedback is weighted heavier with increasing object stiffness as was hypothesized. Both effects were found experimentally, and the subjects' sensory weighting closely resembled the optimal model predictions. To conclude, this study successfully demonstrated sensory weighting within the proprioceptive system.

---

Received Jan. 9, 2009; revised March 16, 2009; accepted April 2, 2009.

Correspondence should be addressed to Winfred Mugge, Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands. Email: w.mugge{at}tudelft.nl

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help