QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, May 20, 2009, 29(20):6479-6489; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3753-08.2009

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Gainey, M. A. Articles by Turrigiano, G. G. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gainey, M. A. Articles by Turrigiano, G. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Cellular/Molecular
Synaptic Scaling Requires the GluR2 Subunit of the AMPA Receptor

Melanie A. Gainey, ^* Jennifer R. Hurvitz-Wolff, ^* Mary E. Lambo, and Gina G. Turrigiano

Department of Biology and Center for Behavioral Genomics, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454

Correspondence should be addressed to Gina G. Turrigiano, Department of Biology and Center for Behavioral Genomics, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454. Email: turrigiano{at}brandeis.edu

Two functionally distinct forms of synaptic plasticity, Hebbian long-term potentiation (LTP) and homeostatic synaptic scaling, are thought to cooperate to promote information storage and circuit refinement. Both arise through changes in the synaptic accumulation of AMPA receptors (AMPARs), but whether they use similar or distinct receptor-trafficking pathways is unknown. Here, we show that TTX-induced synaptic scaling in cultured visual cortical neurons leads to the insertion of GluR2-containing AMPARs at synapses. Similarly, visual deprivation with monocular TTX injections results in synaptic accumulation of GluR2-containing AMPARs. Unlike chemical LTP, synaptic scaling is blocked by a GluR2 C-tail peptide but not by a GluR1 C-tail peptide. Knockdown of endogenous GluR2 with an short hairpin RNA (shRNA) also blocks synaptic scaling but not chemical LTP. Scaling can be rescued with expression of exogenous GluR2 resistant to the shRNA, but a chimeric GluR2 subunit with the C-terminal domain swapped with the GluR1 C-terminal domain (GluR2/CT1) does not rescue synaptic scaling, indicating that regulatory sequences on the GluR2 C-tail are required for the accumulation of synaptic AMPARs during scaling. Together, our results suggest that synaptic scaling and LTP use different trafficking pathways, making these two forms of plasticity both functionally and molecularly distinct.

---

Received Aug. 8, 2008; revised March 6, 2009; accepted March 31, 2009.

Correspondence should be addressed to Gina G. Turrigiano, Department of Biology and Center for Behavioral Genomics, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454. Email: turrigiano{at}brandeis.edu

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help