WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, June 10, 2009, 29(23):7526-7539; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0386-09.2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luk, C.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Wallis, J. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luk, C.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Wallis, J. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Dynamic Encoding of Responses and Outcomes by Neurons in Medial Prefrontal Cortex

Chung-Hay Luk2 and Jonathan D. Wallis1,2

1Department of Psychology and 2Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-3190

Correspondence should be addressed to Jonathan D. Wallis, 132 Barker Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3190. Email: wallis{at}berkeley.edu

Medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) both contribute to goal-directed behavior, but their precise role remains unclear. Several lines of evidence suggest that MPFC is more important than LPFC for outcome-guided response selection. To examine this, we trained two subjects to perform a task that required them to monitor the specific outcome associated with a specific response on a trial-by-trial basis. While the subjects performed this task, we recorded the electrical activity of single neurons simultaneously from MPFC and LPFC. There were marked differences in the neuronal properties of these two areas. Neurons encoding the response were present in both areas, but in MPFC, there were also neurons that encoded the outcome. In particular, neurons encoded the subject's intended response and how preferable the received outcome was. Thus, only in MPFC was all the information necessary to solve the task encoded. In addition, largely separate populations of MPFC neurons encoded the response and the outcome. Neurons encoding the outcome were in the anterior parts of MPFC: posterior to the corpus callosum, there was a marked drop in their incidence. Our results suggest differences in the contribution of MPFC and LPFC to action control. MPFC neurons encode the desirability of the outcome produced by a specific response on a trial-by-trial basis. This capability may contribute to several of the functions of MPFC, such as action valuation, error detection, and decision making.


Received Jan. 23, 2009; revised May 8, 2009; accepted May 12, 2009.

Correspondence should be addressed to Jonathan D. Wallis, 132 Barker Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3190. Email: wallis{at}berkeley.edu






-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-