WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, June 24, 2009, 29(25):8114-8118; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5507-08.2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kishiyama, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Knight, R. T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kishiyama, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Knight, R. T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Brief Communications
Novelty Enhancements in Memory Are Dependent on Lateral Prefrontal Cortex

Mark M. Kishiyama,1 Andrew P. Yonelinas,3 and Robert T. Knight1,2

1Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and 2Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, and 3Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616

Correspondence should be addressed to Mark M. Kishiyama, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, 132 Barker Hall, MC #3190, Berkeley, CA 94720-3190. Email: mmkishiyama{at}berkeley.edu

Physiological evidence indicates that several brain regions, including the medial temporal lobes and prefrontal cortex (PFC), are involved in processing events that are novel or distinctive in their immediate context. However, behavioral studies that investigate whether these regions are critical for producing stimulus novelty advantages in memory are limited. For example, evidence from an animal lesion study indicated that the PFC is involved in stimulus novelty effects, but this has not been examined in humans. In the current study, we used a von Restorff novelty paradigm to test a large cohort of lateral PFC patients (n = 16). We found that patients with lateral PFC damage were impaired in recollection- and familiarity-based recognition, and they did not exhibit a normal memory advantage for novel compared with non-novel items. These results provide neuropsychological evidence supporting a key role for the lateral PFC in producing stimulus novelty advantages in memory.


Received Nov. 14, 2008; revised April 15, 2009; accepted May 22, 2009.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mark M. Kishiyama, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, 132 Barker Hall, MC #3190, Berkeley, CA 94720-3190. Email: mmkishiyama{at}berkeley.edu






-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-