QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, July 22, 2009, 29(29):9351-9360; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1744-09.2009

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Smarandache, C. Articles by Mulloney, B. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smarandache, C. Articles by Mulloney, B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Coordination of Rhythmic Motor Activity by Gradients of Synaptic Strength in a Neural Circuit That Couples Modular Neural Oscillators

Carmen Smarandache,^1,2 Wendy M. Hall,^1,2 and Brian Mulloney^1,2

¹Department of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, and ²Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616-8519

Correspondence should be addressed to Carmen Smarandache, Department of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, 196 Briggs Hall, University of California, Davis, One Shields Drive, Davis, CA 95616-8519. Email: csmarandache{at}ucdavis.edu

Synchronization of distributed neural circuits is required for many behavioral tasks, but the mechanisms that coordinate these circuits are largely unknown. The modular local circuits that control crayfish swimmerets are distributed in four segments of the CNS, but when the swimmeret system is active their outputs are synchronized with a stable intersegmental phase difference of 0.25, an example of metachronal synchronization (Izhikevich, 2007). In each module, coordinating neurons encode detailed information about each cycle of the module's motor output as bursts of spikes, and their axons conduct this information to targets in other segments. This information is both necessary and sufficient for normal intersegmental coordination. In a comprehensive set of recordings, we mapped the synaptic connections of two types of coordinating neurons onto their common target neurons in other segments. Both types of coordinating axons caused large, brief EPSPs in their targets. The shape indices of these EPSPs are tuned to transmit the information from each axon precisely. In each target neuron's own module, these bursts of EPSPs modified the phase of the module's motor output. Each axon made its strongest synapse onto the target neuron in the nearest neighboring segment. Its synapses onto homologous targets in more remote segments were progressively weaker. Each target neuron decodes information from several coordinating axons, and the strengths of their synapses differ systematically. These differences in synaptic strength weight information from each segment differently, which might account for features of the system's characteristic metachronal synchronization.

---

Received April 9, 2009; revised June 15, 2009; accepted June 22, 2009.

Correspondence should be addressed to Carmen Smarandache, Department of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, 196 Briggs Hall, University of California, Davis, One Shields Drive, Davis, CA 95616-8519. Email: csmarandache{at}ucdavis.edu

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help