The Journal of Neuroscience, January 21, 2009, 29(3):811-827; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2424-08.2009
Previous Article | Next Article 
Neurobiology of Disease
Spatiotemporal Patterns of Cortical Activity with Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Congenital Deafness
Andrej Kral,1,4
Jochen Tillein,1,2
Peter Hubka,1
Dorrit Schiemann,1
Silvia Heid,3
Rainer Hartmann,3 and
Andreas Karl Engel1
1Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany, 2MedEl Company, AT-6020 Innsbruck, Austria, 3Institute of Physiology II, J. W. Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany, and 4School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75083-0688
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Andrej Kral, Laboratory of Auditory Neuroscience, Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Email: a.kral{at}uke.de
Congenital deafness affects developmental processes in the auditory cortex. In this study, local field potentials (LFPs) were mapped at the cortical surface with microelectrodes in response to cochlear implant stimulation. LFPs were compared between hearing controls and congenitally deaf cats (CDCs). Pulsatile electrical stimulation initially evoked cortical activity in the rostral parts of the primary auditory field (A1). This progressed both in the approximate dorsoventral direction (along the isofrequency stripe) and in the rostrocaudal direction. The dorsal branch of the wavefront split into a caudal branch (propagating in A1) and another smaller one propagating rostrally into the AAF (anterior auditory field). After the front reached the caudal border of A1, a "reflection wave" appeared, propagating back rostrally. In total, the waves took
13–15 ms to propagate along A1 and return back. In CDCs, the propagation pattern was significantly disturbed, with a more synchronous activation of distant cortical regions. The maps obtained from contralateral and ipsilateral stimulation overlapped in both groups of animals. Although controls showed differences in the latency–amplitude patterns, cortical waves evoked by contralateral and ipsilateral stimulation were more similar in CDCs. Additionally, in controls, LFPs with contralateral and ipsilateral stimulation were more similar in caudal A1 than in rostral A1. This dichotomy was lost in deaf animals. In conclusion, propagating cortical waves are specific for the contralateral ear, they are affected by auditory deprivation, and the specificity of the cortex for stimulation of the contralateral ear is reduced by deprivation.
Key words: deprivation; maturation; development; propagating waves; contralaterality; deafness
Received May 25, 2008;
revised Nov. 17, 2008;
accepted Nov. 25, 2008.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Andrej Kral, Laboratory of Auditory Neuroscience, Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Email: a.kral{at}uke.de
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Tillein, P. Hubka, E. Syed, R. Hartmann, A.K. Engel, and A. Kral
Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference in Congenital Deafness
Cereb Cortex,
November 11, 2009;
(2009)
bhp222v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|