The Journal of Neuroscience, October 7, 2009, 29(40):12675-12685; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3359-09.2009
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Intracranial EEG Reveals a Time- and Frequency-Specific Role for the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Primary Motor Cortex in Stopping Initiated Responses
Nicole Swann,1,2
Nitin Tandon,3
Ryan Canolty,4
Timothy M. Ellmore,3
Linda K. McEvoy,5
Stephen Dreyer,3
Michael DiSano,3 and
Adam R. Aron1,2
1Neuroscience Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0662, 2Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0109, 3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas 77030, 4Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-3192 and Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1770, and 5Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California 92103-8756
Correspondence should be addressed to Adam R. Aron, Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109. Email: adamaron{at}ucsd.edu
Inappropriate response tendencies may be stopped via a specific fronto/basal ganglia/primary motor cortical network. We sought to characterize the functional role of two regions in this putative stopping network, the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and the primary motor cortex (M1), using electocorticography from subdural electrodes in four patients while they performed a stop-signal task. On each trial, a motor response was initiated, and on a minority of trials a stop signal instructed the patient to try to stop the response. For each patient, there was a greater right IFG response in the beta frequency band (
16 Hz) for successful versus unsuccessful stop trials. This finding adds to evidence for a functional network for stopping because changes in beta frequency activity have also been observed in the basal ganglia in association with behavioral stopping. In addition, the right IFG response occurred 100–250 ms after the stop signal, a time range consistent with a putative inhibitory control process rather than with stop-signal processing or feedback regarding success. A downstream target of inhibitory control is M1. In each patient, there was alpha/beta band desynchronization in M1 for stop trials. However, the degree of desynchronization in M1 was less for successfully than unsuccessfully stopped trials. This reduced desynchronization on successful stop trials could relate to increased GABA inhibition in M1. Together with other findings, the results suggest that behavioral stopping is implemented via synchronized activity in the beta frequency band in a right IFG/basal ganglia network, with downstream effects on M1.
Received July 13, 2009;
revised Aug. 14, 2009;
accepted Aug. 25, 2009.
Correspondence should be addressed to Adam R. Aron, Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109. Email: adamaron{at}ucsd.edu