WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, February 11, 2009, 29(6):1688-1698; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5021-08.2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Preston, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Welchman, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Preston, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Welchman, A. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Adaptive Estimation of Three-Dimensional Structure in the Human Brain

Tim J. Preston, Zoe Kourtzi, and Andrew E. Welchman

School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom

Correspondence should be addressed to Andrew E. Welchman, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. Email: A.E.Welchman{at}bham.ac.uk

Perceiving the three-dimensional (3D) properties of the environment relies on the brain bringing together ambiguous cues (e.g., binocular disparity, shading, texture) with information gained from short- and long-term experience. Perceptual aftereffects, in which the perception of an ambiguous 3D stimulus is biased away from the shape of a previously viewed stimulus, provide a sensitive means of probing this process, yet little is known about their neural basis. Here, we investigate 3D aftereffects using psychophysical and functional MRI (fMRI) adaptation paradigms to gain insight into the cortical circuits that mediate the perceptual interpretation of ambiguous depth signals. Using two classic bistable stimuli (Mach card, kinetic depth effect), we test aftereffects produced by 3D shapes defined by binocular (disparity) or monocular (texture, shading) depth cues. We show that the processing of ambiguous 3D stimuli in dorsal visual cortical areas (V3B/KO, V7) and posterior parietal regions is modulated by adaptation in line with perceptual aftereffects. Similar behavioral and fMRI adaptation effects for the two types of bistable stimuli suggest common neural substrates for depth aftereffects independent of the inducing depth cues (disparity, texture, shading). In line with current thinking about the role of adaptation in sensory optimization, our findings provide evidence that estimation of 3D shape in dorsal cortical areas takes account of the adaptive context to resolve depth ambiguity and interpret 3D structure.

Key words: ambiguous perception; bistability; fMRI adaptation; depth perception; psychophysics; vision


Received Oct. 17, 2008; revised Jan. 5, 2009; accepted Jan. 7, 2009.

Correspondence should be addressed to Andrew E. Welchman, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. Email: A.E.Welchman{at}bham.ac.uk






-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-