WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience Seahorse Bioscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Poulos, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Poulos, D. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Neuroscience, Vol 3, 1572-1585, Copyright © 1983 by Society for Neuroscience


ARTICLE

The neural signal for skin indentation depth. I. Changing indentations

PR Burgess, J Mei, RP Tuckett, KW Horch, CM Ballinger and DA Poulos

Psychophysical tests on human subjects showed that judgments of skin indentation depth made when the fingertip was indented at rates from 0.2 to 16 mm/sec were quite insensitive to changes in indentation velocity. Similar results were obtained on the forearm at indentation velocities of 0.4 to 16 mm/sec. Recordings were made from mechanoreceptors in the monkey's hand that were able to respond over the same range of velocities and at comparable depths to determine how skin indentation depth might be signaled (coded) at the receptor level and to examine the rate sensitivity of the possible depth codes. It was found that most of the receptors with foci under the stimulator were recruited relatively early during an indentation, especially at velocities of 1.6 mm/sec and higher, making it improbable that the full range of indentation depths is signaled by the "subsurface" recruitment of different receptors at different indentation depths. A subsurface recruitment code involving subcutaneous receptors is not likely since subjects could feel virtually none of the stimuli after skin anesthesia. Progressive recruitment with depth of receptors whose foci lie further and further away from the stimulator ("lateral" recruitment) was considered an unlikely depth code because changing the area of the stimulator had little effect on its perceived depth. Also, it was shown that subjects could sense the curvature of the indentation (the profile of the depth at right angles to the skin surface), which requires information about the depth of individual patches of skin beneath the stimulator. There is no obvious way that a lateral recruitment code can provide this information. Thus it is probable that the discharge rate of some or all of the receptors excited by the indentation is involved in indicating its depth. Both impulse frequency and receptor recruitment at any given depth increased as the velocity of the indentation increased. The demonstrated reliability of information about skin indentation depth in humans indicates that the central neural circuitry responsible for judgments of skin indentation depth is able to compensate for the rate-sensitive receptor signals.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. S. Khalsa, C. Zhang, and Y.-X. Qin
Encoding of Location and Intensity of Noxious Indentation Into Rat Skin by Spatial Populations of Cutaneous Mechano-Nociceptors
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 3049 - 3061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
F. Vega-Bermudez and K. O. Johnson
SA1 and RA Receptive Fields, Response Variability, and Population Responses Mapped with a Probe Array
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 2701 - 2710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. S. Khalsa, R. M. Friedman, M. A. Srinivasan, and R. H. Lamotte
Encoding of Shape and Orientation of Objects Indented Into the Monkey Fingerpad by Populations of Slowly and Rapidly Adapting Mechanoreceptors
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 3238 - 3251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-