WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (48)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berridge, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fentress, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berridge, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fentress, J. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Neuroscience, Vol 6, 325-330, Copyright © 1986 by Society for Neuroscience


ARTICLE

Contextual control of trigeminal sensorimotor function

KC Berridge and JC Fentress

Simple actions, such as rhythmic tongue protrusions, forelimb facial strokes, and forelimb flails, are emitted by rats both during taste- elicited ingestion/aversion and during postprandial grooming. This study combined peripheral trigeminal deafferentation with a computer- assisted video analysis of action form to examine the use of cutaneous feedback from the face in action production. Changes in action form after deafferentation were found to be context-dependent: Deformations characterized rhythmic tongue protrusions when emitted in ingestive but not in grooming contexts. The opposite was true for alterations in forelimb action. Further, postprandial grooming as a whole was found to comprise distinct sequentially defined phases. Actions occurring in one highly stereotyped sequence phase were protected from deafferentation effects, although the same actions occurring outside of this phase were not. The results suggest that behavioral context (e.g., grooming versus ingestive set, sequence phase) can shift the integration of sensory guided and endogenous mechanisms that pattern simple actions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
M. J. Z. Hartmann
Active touch, exploratory movements, and sensory prediction
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2009; 49(6): 681 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. J. Hartmann and J. M. Bower
Tactile Responses in the Granule Cell Layer of Cerebellar Folium Crus IIa of Freely Behaving Rats
J. Neurosci., May 15, 2001; 21(10): 3549 - 3563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-