WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience AAN Call for Abstracts
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burmeister, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burmeister, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, D. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Neuroscience, Vol 8, 3151-3159, Copyright © 1988 by Society for Neuroscience


ARTICLE

Micropruning: the mechanism of turning of Aplysia growth cones at substrate borders in vitro

DW Burmeister and DJ Goldberg
Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032.

Growth cones of Aplysia californica neurons were observed with video- enhanced contrast-differential interference contrast (VEC-DIC) microscopy as they turned at a border between poly-L-lysine-treated and untreated glass. Growth cones that turned generally developed 2 distinct active areas of filopodial and veil formation, much in the way of growth cones undergoing branching. Both active areas advanced, but turning of the neurite occurred through the selective resorption of the incipient branches developing on the untreated substrate. Thus, micropruning of developing regions of the growth cone, rather than the asymmetric extension of filopodia or veils, was primarily responsible for directing neurite growth. We present the hypothesis that abrupt turns by growing neurites are mediated by 2 sets of signals, one causing growth cone splitting, and a second set regulating the survival of the separate branches.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. B. Steketee and K. W. Tosney
Three Functionally Distinct Adhesions in Filopodia: Shaft Adhesions Control Lamellar Extension
J. Neurosci., September 15, 2002; 22(18): 8071 - 8083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Polinsky, K. Balazovich, and K. W. Tosney
Identification of an Invariant Response: Stable Contact with Schwann Cells Induces Veil Extension in Sensory Growth Cones
J. Neurosci., February 1, 2000; 20(3): 1044 - 1055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. A. Mason and L.-C. Wang
Growth Cone Form Is Behavior-Specific and, Consequently, Position-Specific along the Retinal Axon Pathway
J. Neurosci., February 1, 1997; 17(3): 1086 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
L Erskine and C. McCaig
Integrated interactions between chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans and weak dc electric fields regulate nerve growth cone guidance in vitro
J. Cell Sci., January 8, 1997; 110(16): 1957 - 1965.
[Abstract] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-