QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wigston, D. J. Articles by Donahue, S. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wigston, D. J. Articles by Donahue, S. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Neuroscience, Vol 8, 3451-3458, Copyright © 1988 by Society for Neuroscience

ARTICLE

The location of cues promoting selective reinnervation of axolotl muscles

DJ Wigston and SP Donahue
Department of Physiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322.

The selective reinnervation of muscles suggests that muscles have intrinsic recognition cues that promote selective synaptogenesis. For example, the anterior and posterior heads of the axolotl iliotibialis (ILT) muscle are preferentially reinnervated by their original motoneurons even after surgically exchanging them. The nature and location of cues that promote such selectivity are unknown, although previous work suggests that the muscle fibers themselves might harbor the relevant molecules. To address this question, we removed anterior and posterior ILT muscles, destroyed their myofibers by surgically damaging them and treating them with bupivacaine, and reimplanted them in either a normal or a reversed anterior/posterior orientation. After the regenerated myofibers became innervated, we stimulated different spinal nerves and recorded the synaptic potentials evoked in muscle fibers. Our results showed that if the muscles were removed, damaged, and reimplanted in their original positions, the segmental origin of inputs to the regenerated myofibers was similar to that seen in normal muscles and in muscles reimplanted with their myofibers intact. However, muscles that were removed and damaged but regenerated in new positions were innervated differently from normal muscles and from muscles whose myofibers survived transplantation. Thus, the site at which a muscle regenerates has an influence on the source of the muscle's reinnervation. Nevertheless, the innervation of muscles that regenerated after transplantation to a foreign site was not strictly appropriate for the new position, but was biased towards the muscle's original innervation pattern. Therefore, some, but not all, of the cues that reflect the original identity of the transplanted muscles survive the replacement of its myofibers.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. L. Zealear, R. J. Rodriguez, T. Kenny, M. J. Billante, Y. Cho, C. R. Billante, and K. C. Garren Electrical Stimulation of a Denervated Muscle Promotes Selective Reinnervation by Native Over Foreign Motoneurons J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2002; 87(4): 2195 - 2199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help